You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

consenting exploitation is still exploitation

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/exploit

Scroll down to verbs. When you’re talking about someone else, there’s an implication of unfairness. This is why vegans don’t eat animals or use animal products. If the animals could consent, there would be nothing wrong with it.

I reiterate: it would not be unfair for Astarion or Lenore to drain several pints of blood from my neck

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The definition from the vegan society doesn’t mention unfairness at all. it prohibits exploitation carte blanche

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And exploitation, when talking about living things, implies unfairness and nonconsent

You realize the word becomes entirely useless if we use your definition, yeah? Virtually every interaction between living things becomes exploitation under your silly definition. It’s not very useful. I’ll stick with the more widely used definition, wherein it would be exploitation for Nosferatu to suck my blood, but not Mavis Dracula or her dad

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Greentext

!greentext@sh.itjust.works

Create post

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you’re new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

  • Anon is often crazy.
  • Anon is often depressed.
  • Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

Community stats

  • 8.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 846

    Posts

  • 16K

    Comments