You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
38 points

Variety is good to a point. Too many alternatives and all you get is a bunch of under-resourced and unpolished results.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I disagree.

This assumes that progress on one distro doesn’t lead to progress on others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

There is a difference between feature development and distro maintenance/packaging.

Feature development is done upstream and does flow down to others.

Distro maintenance and packaging is downstream, and almost never provides value to other distros. It usually doesn’t even provide value to the next release. Distro maintenance is a hard, thankless Sisyphean task.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You think there is a dearth of software engineers out there who can’t spend time on something cool like a linux distro?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Well, yeah. Its pretty well established that there is fairly limited resources in open source. Loads of software engineers, very few contributors.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Maybe because of projects that aren’t interested in the opinions of distro maintainers, let alone individual contributors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

We can try to lower the barrier of entry. But nowadays open source maintainers have to actually limit controbutions due to a significant increase in supply chain attacks and generally untrustworthy code contributions.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Linux

!linux@programming.dev

Create post

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

Community stats

  • 2.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 564

    Posts

  • 4.9K

    Comments