You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
42 points

The nearly endless campaign cycle seems tailor-made to wear us out. Wouldn’t it be nice to have it for two weeks max and then vote and be done with it? Everyone already knows how they’re gonna vote, don’t they?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

You needed that much time before TV to travel the US because it was so large. With the information overload age, that is definitely not a problem anymore as everyone can see every rally and debate remotely

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yeah, French and British showed us we don’t need that much time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*

Their territory is also extremely small though so in a week you can cover a lot of places to hold assemblies. Candidates will still want to show up in most States at least once so a month and a half is pretty much the minimum…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Their territory is also extremely small

Other way around. At 4th largest and 3rd most populated country in the world, the US is extremely oversized and should really be broken up like the banks should.

Candidates will still want to show up in most States at least once

Which is just empty pandering that most voters see right through.

If asked whether they would prefer a campaign stop or an extra week working on policy that helps their state, reasonable people choose the latter every time.

permalink
report
parent
reply

People Twitter

!whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

Create post

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

Community stats

  • 10K

    Monthly active users

  • 661

    Posts

  • 13K

    Comments