Summary
Following Kamala Harris’s unexpected defeat, Democratic leaders are scrutinizing their party’s failures, particularly with working-class voters.
Figures like Bernie Sanders, Chris Murphy, and Ro Khanna argue the party lacks a strong economic message, especially for those frustrated with stagnant mobility and neoliberal policies.
Sanders emphasized Democrats’ disconnect from working-class concerns, while Murphy criticized the party’s unwillingness to challenge wealthy interests.
DNC Chair Jaime Harrison announced he won’t seek re-election, leaving the party’s leadership in flux as Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries prepare to assume top roles amid a Republican resurgence.
Here’s part 2 of my comment because lemmy wouldn’t me put this in the first reply.
I’m not familiar with this one, and a brief search makes me think it may be HOAs on steroids. Do you have an explainer you can link?
What Does It Mean to Decommodify Housing?
Federal policies enabling real estate speculation have allowed private actors to profit off housing investments while evading their fiscal, social, and legal accountability to tenants (Ferrer 2021). Combined with the disinvestment in public and subsidized housing, this has led to an unprecedented level of commodification, which produces and perpetuates housing injustice. To achieve increased (and ideally universal) housing affordability and access, advocates are calling for housing to be removed from the speculative market, or decommodified.17 This entails removing a significant portion of the housing stock from the private market, thus reducing the impact of speculation on housing access and ensuring permanent affordability by shifting to alternative housing models that promote public or community ownership and focus on protecting residents from displacement.18 Decommodified housing models fall into two broad categories:
◼ Public or social housing, which is generally owned by governments or other public entities, and
◼ shared equity models, in which ownership is generally shared between residents and community members or organizations
https://www.urban.org/research/publication/decommodification-and-its-role-advancing-housing-justice
? You mean just more of them? We have them in like every park around here.
For a while, Pierre-Louis writes, drinking fountains were a more popular source of water than bottled water. But the trend reversed and today drinking fountains are, by all accounts, disappearing. “Though no one tracks the number of public fountains nationally, researchers say they’re fading from America’s parks, schools and stadiums,” she writes.
I would at least give various levels of police support for the wellness check, ranging from a police radio to backup close at hand.
Having security for social and health care workers or someone to restrain a patient is a separate concern from what the police do. If the police show up they can use deadly force, which isn’t wanted in health care cases. Social workers will most likely own a cell phone to call 911 and could easily be provided with one. I recommend watching Last Week Tonight, they’ve done extensive research into police reform.
https://themighty.com/topic/mental-health/police-respond-mental-health-crisis-check-dangerous/
How do you even go about that?
The Strategic Interactive Approach (SIA), which I have developed and tested to combat cult mind control, encourages a positive, warm relationship between cult members and their families while helping to raise essential questions for cult members to consider.
It seems there has been work done on this topic. There are apparently more effective ways to go about it than 1970s cult deprogramming techniques. By all means, do those. But the answer cannot be to do nothing. It’s got to be to do something.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/freedom-of-mind/202303/beyond-cult-deprogramming
My own parents are the best possible argument for it,
My Mom and my deceased Grandmother are as well. I’m sure lots of people can attest to this.
but it would still need to pass muster in terms of the Constitution.
I definitely have a distaste for media that attempts to proselytize, though.
The foundation of freedom is the truth. That’s true of free speech and free press. At the bare minimum the media needs to be committed to telling the truth. To be clear, correcting errors is important, but I am referring to the Fairness Doctrine. We used to have standards for this.
