You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
14 points

The right to exist is worth fighting over and people should be pissed at her for surrendering on our behalf. Access to bathrooms is fucking important and her statement even manages to make that sound trivial.

All the 4d chess political maneuvers are a poor excuse, I remain disappointed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Conversely, taking a stance on that single issue would rule her out of doing any other aspect of her job. You’re right, it’s important, but more can be achieved by going along with it. If anything, these transphobic fucks might get a reality check when they realise they’re sharing a bathroom with a fucking woman.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You’re right of course, but there’s a certain segment of the party that’s addicted to Losing With Dignity, and is afraid to fight for anything. They’ll go as far as to coach you on how brilliant it is to willingly give up your rights and retreat from public existence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That definitely happens a lot with Democratic politicians, but I don’t think that’s what happened here. Because this is specifically targeted at the Capitol and House office buildings and will likely only affect McBride, backing down here is a purely symbolic retreat. It’s not like she’s backing down from fighting for trans rights as a whole (at least, I don’t expect that she will).

permalink
report
parent
reply

Transgender

!transgender@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Create post

The Lemmy place to discuss the news and experiences of transgender people.

Rules:

  1. Keep discussions civil.

  2. Arguments against transgender rights will be removed.

  3. No bigotry is allowed - including transphobia, homophobia, speciesism, racism, sexism, classism, ableism, castism, or xenophobia.

Community stats

  • 1.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 599

    Posts

  • 822

    Comments