You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
7 points

Video hosting costs a lot of money. I wouldn’t expect that to be delivered for free

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Youtube servers are terrible. Why not focus on offering a smoother experience? Then charge what you want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

What’s terrible about them? I have no issues here in west Europe

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Well then make Premium a reasonable price.

And just don’t provide stuff for free. Nobody forces alphabet to provide youtube without account and for free.

It was a money sink since Google created it

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They don’t provide stuff for free, they provide stuff in exchange for your data and to sell ads.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Bough it

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Bough it

Twish it!

Pull it!

(Yeah I know this joke is a stretch lmao)

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

They had a good thing going. YouTube was far from unprofitable. But the skyrocketing density and plummeting quality of ads drove people to adblockers.

I suspect though, the day will soon come when ad-space is no longer quite so valuable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It was fine until “the adpocalypse”, when advertisers pulled their ads because they were being shown with offensive videos.

While YouTube has been trying to fix the problem the quality of the ads has reduced. So many advertisers now only go through sponsorship, which doesn’t give any share to YouTube.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Programmer Humor

!programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

Create post

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

Community stats

  • 5.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 885

    Posts

  • 9K

    Comments

Community moderators