Because you now did it to yourself.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
5 points
*

Hitler didn’t come to power by getting elected.

The liberal SDP split with the communists, supporting “centrist” Hindenburg in the name of unity.

The communists campaigned on “A vote for Hindenburg is a vote for Hitler is a vote for war”

Hindenburg, the liberal candidate, won the election, then proceeded to make Hitler, chancellor and staff positions in government with nazis while purging the government of communists.

The nazis then barely had to do anything to assert complete control.

The nazis didn’t get in power because people voted fascist, they got into power because liberals prefer fascism to working with communists.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

What a load of bullshit.

First off, the communists split from the SPD, not the other way around. Second, the communists completely refused to work with the (according to them) “social fascist” SPD. Third, the one alternative to Hindenburg in that election was literally Hitler and the other was Thälmann who, again, was as explicitly anti-democratic as Hitler. Fourth, Hindenburg did not immediately appoint Hitler, he did so only after Hitler had secured a majority in parliament (courtesy of the DNVP). Fifth, no, the alleged liberals (social democrats) did not cooperate with the communists because the communists were too busy trying to turn Germany into a second Soviet Union and were the only ones to vote against the enabling act (the communists having already been purged from parliament). The communists only made token efforts at reconciliation after Hitler had already succeeded.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

First off, the communists split from the SPD, not the other way around. Second, the communists completely refused to work with the (according to them) “social fascist” SPD.

This is the correct response to the SPD endorsing Hindenburg in the name of unity (against the communists) after years of the SPD arming and approving the freikorps massacring the communists.

Thälmann who, again, was as explicitly anti-democratic as Hitler

The fact that you consider the alternative to Hitler and the guy who gave power to Hitler to be unfeasible shows that liberals haven’t changed, you still prefer fascism to working with the left.

trying to turn Germany into a second Soviet Union

The USSR went from one of the poorest countries in the world to a space-faring superpower in a single lifetime. Imagine what it could do for an already industrialized country.

Nah, better work with the fascists instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Leopards Ate My Face

!leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world

Create post

Rules:

  • If you don’t already have some understanding of what this is, try reading this post. Off-topic posts will be removed.
  • Please use a high-quality source to explain why your post fits if you think it might not be common knowledge and isn’t explained within the post itself.
  • Links to articles should be high-quality sources – for example, not the Daily Mail, the New York Post, Newsweek, etc. For a rough idea, check out this list. If it’s marked in red, it probably isn’t allowed; if it’s yellow, exercise caution.
  • The mods are fallible; if you’ve been banned or had a comment removed, you’re encouraged to appeal it.
  • For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the comments.
  • All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

Community stats

  • 2.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 79

    Posts

  • 3.2K

    Comments