You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
86 points

I’d also like to see more imagery of Jesus smashing up the temple rather than him calmly sitting under a tree.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

It’s easy for religious figures to be depicted as tranquil. They are often all-knowing, and if not, have faith in something all-knowing. They can blindly believe that everything will be fine, even if right now things look bad.

Because sky-daddy will take care of things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

The more I know, the less fucking tranquil I am.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Well, yes.

But by all-knowing, I meant the kind of view an omniscient god would have, accompanied by complete control of the universe.

Essentially, religious figures typically get to exist, knowing for sure that everything is going and will go according to plan.

It’s EASY to be tranquil, then. Even easier if you’re just a human, who genuinely believes such an entity exists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

This is nothing to do with actual tranquility (in the sense of passaddhi), which is basically the opposite of everything you are describing.

You don’t cultivate tranquility by not knowing “not caring” about worldly factors; you cultivate tranquililty by abandoning the five hindrances (covetousness, ill-will, sloth, agitation, and compulsive questioning).

The Upanisa Sutta says that tranquillity comes from rapture and leads to happiness (the Samaññaphala Sutta repeats this). The precondition for tranquility is rapture, not “not caring about the state of the world”.

Tranquility is a mind that maintains a spacious calm in the face of adverse conditions. It’s nothing like what you’re saying.

Your view is harmful because you’re saying that someone without tranquility (with covetousness, ill-will, sloth, agitation, and compulsive questioning, without rapture), will be better equipped to deal with worldly problems, but the exact opposite is true: tranquility creates the space to deal with worldly problems more effectively. It’s harmful to advocate for hindrances because you claim that means people “care” more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

We are using different definitions of the word.

You explain what your definition is, which affects mine (being the dictionary defintion) in no way whatsoever. We have nothing to discuss.

What you describe I would call stoicism, competence, composure or equanimity.

Most simply, level-headedness.

But not tranquility. Tranquility, by definition, being a state free of turmoil, cannot be maintained, if dealing with turmoil.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Microblog Memes

!microblogmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, Twitter X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.2K

    Posts

  • 31K

    Comments