You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
75 points

Unfortunately, to get the benefit of the slip steam, you gotta be pretty close to the back of the truck. If you have space for good reaction time, you’re probably too far back

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This has been tested. You still get a reasonable benefit 3 seconds behind; you get practically nothing 6 seconds behind

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

This is correct, especially at lower speeds. Greater fuel efficiency would come from lower wind and drivetrain resistance and use of a more efficient range of the motor’s powerband.

Most vehicles are geared for optimal speed to fuel consumption around 55-65 mph (90-100 kph) not 70+ mph (110+ kph). So just going a bit under the speed limit can have a significant impact on fuel consumption.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Also, truckers drive efficiently, so just following what they do will save gas.

But yeah, I don’t go over 65mph and I end up with 7-10mpg over my highway rating.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

People Twitter

!whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

Create post

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it’s a major figure or a politician.

Community stats

  • 7.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 814

    Posts

  • 20K

    Comments