You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
4 points
*

And? What does 21-23 have to do with who is “currently in power”? And how many SC justices has Biden appointed?

Maybe you should read the entire conversation, it’s not long, instead of knee-jerking to one comment.

Edit: You know how you “restructure” the DNC? You show the fuck up. The average local office would only need 5-6 people regularly showing up, every meeting, not just the last few months before a presidential election, to shift resources and voting recommendations to more progressive primary candidates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Because most of the ones still in office right now (obviously including Biden) were also in office during the 117th Congress when Dems held both majorities?

But this doesn’t feel like it’ll be productive for some reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Still don’t know how that makes 21-23 “current.” Just going to double-down on refusing to read the comment chain and make it about what you want, are you?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Microblog Memes

!microblogmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, Twitter X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.1K

    Posts

  • 28K

    Comments