Lmao, throwing the kitchen sink at us and hoping we won’t check the details?

? You asked for sources, I provided them and you complain…way to start out.

1. Retired Supreme Court Judge

A democrat appointed judge. Guess he doesn’t count some how.

2. Opinion article saying Democrats should, by a staff writer

Ah yea another Democrat that doesn’t count…got it.

3. A House Bill from 20 years ago with no co-sponsors, that didn’t even make it out of committee.

So…a bill from a Democrat…but doesn’t count…this is going to be a trend with you isn’t it?

4. A Podcaster’s opinion article

Another Democrat that doesn’t count…

5. Opinion article saying Democrats should, by a staff writer

Yep definitely a trend…

6. College Professor wrote a book

A democrat got it… doesn’t count

7. The law saying you can’t have fully automatic weapons, (LMFAO, really? you think that’s a repeal of the second?)

I forgot how death by 1000 cuts doesn’t count…you sound like a anti-abortion mouth piece saying abortion can still be had in other states, but it’s fine to be banned in red ones.

8. An article about the the representative from number 3, who again, acted alone, admitted he acted without party support, and admitted it was little more than a political stunt. Thank you for giving us the first real evidence that Democrats are not trying to ban guns or repeal the second.

Sooo yep… doesn’t count because they’re not true Democrats? I hear this a lot from Republicans when they try and refute points…

9. Some state legislators asking for a clarifying amendment. Which, (checks notes), yup completely ignored by the party.

So…(Checks notes) Not a real Democrat…got it.

10. A paywalled opinion piece by a staff writer.

Another not real democrat…man you really think very few people are Democrats.

11. Your Seattle Times article puts those numbers in the correct light, because 39 percent isn’t a majority or anywhere near enough to force action on the national level.

So 39% aren’t real Democrats is what you’re saying?

So no. The answer is no. Because despite using eleven sources you could not find any evidence the democrats are actually trying to ban all guns. Even if we repealed the second amendment it wouldn’t ban all guns, it would just open the opportunity to regulate them.

Got it no real Democrats…

I will however say that every time the GOP offers thoughts and prayers over the bodies of children, that number grows and once it reaches a tipping point a ban will be inevitable and there will be no glorious civil war because support will just be that high.

Why are we talking about the shit stains in the GOP?

If the GOP backed off for even a second and allowed red flag laws and universal background check, and had their state AGs prosecute those laws then there would be less shit for law abiding gun owners to wade through.

You do realize a good chunk of the GOP supports ERPOs right? But again why are we talking about the GOP? That wasn’t your question.

Which is why 75 percent of Americans support Universal Background Check and Gun Licensing. The country is still willing to work with you, that may not be true in a another decade with a hundred more high profile mass casualty events at schools.

We’ve had 15 mass shootings in schools since Columbine… we’re going to need to have way more each year to get to 100 in under a decade. UBC requires a registery, but most people are to stupid to know this…and gun licensing is a joke.

None of that is going to stop or even dent gun deaths in this country.

39% support among Democrats. Not all Democrats, not a plurality, and not even a majority.

So those %39 aren’t really Democrats? Got it…

Two of those fucking links went to the same stupid bill from 1994 that a handful of people put forward as an alternative to the assault weapons ban, and one of them is goddamn sticker on Amazon. You really are grasping at straws here.

Lol no they’re not, and the Amazon link is for a book from a Democrat…but ok…

I can understand the appeal for repealing the 2nd amendment, since a lot of people consider it too vague to have any real meaning, and the conservative loaded SC has determined that “well regulated militia” extends to groups of racist hilljacks in a pickup shooting unarmed black men.

Yea no… it’s only people who are antigun that find it vague… it’s got commas and states two things. The people should be able to bear arms and that the militia should exist… because at that time both sides considered a standing army to be a no go…so history tells us it’s not vague… just antigun groups do.

That being said though… 39% of Dems oppose it, which means that the Democratic party as a whole is 61% in favor of keeping it.

Lol…yea cause 39% is so little.

So, are you gonna take the L and delete your comment, or are you gonna post another wall of bullshit that you didn’t even bother to read before calling it gospel and spreading it over the fediverse?

You mean are you going to keep whining because you don’t know history and think dems are pro2a?