self-explenatory 🦆

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
7 points

Failed. It asked for one duck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

What if this is a quantum duck that is simultaneously both two ducks, but also just one duck?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Then it proves none of us can observe, or it would have collapsed!

Also I feel The Quantum Duck should be a James Bond-esque spy, but a duck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Damnit, physics wins again!

Okay, you now know what your next drawing target should be - get quacking!

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

that’s just duck dna dont judge

permalink
report
parent
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 7.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.7K

    Posts

  • 83K

    Comments