(Yes, of course I know that’s not the Enterprise-D and that TNG came out in 1986, but you try making a better debunking joke.)

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
96 points
*

My favorite debunking is an old YouTube video called “moon hoax not” where a filmmaker explains that the due to technology limits of the time, faking the multi-hour live broadcasts in slow-motion, which millions of people were watching, would be impossible without there being telltale signs of it being spliced film (the splicing, film grain, etc.). Since slow-mo video (distinct from film; TV broadcasts were video) at the time could not play back more than a few seconds of footage, at most, it would have to be high-speed film played back at normal speed. Assuming you could find or make a high-speed camera fit to task. While the first landing had awful video quality, later missions had much higher quality and the film fakery would be impossible to completely hide. People these days massively overestimate the video (and film) technology that was available in 1969. (IIRC. It’s been years since I’ve last rewatched it.)

Edit: TL;DR: Perfectly faking the multi-hour uninterrupted video broadcasts (i.e., either inventing slow-motion video that can last hours, or perfectly passing off a multi-hour film as video) in slow-motion would have been significantly more difficult than sending humans to the moon with 1969 technology.

permalink
report
reply
49 points

Flawless 4K special effects have been available for over 100 years, but the government’s been hiding them!

Re-hoaxed :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Now this one is really concerning!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Everyone knows the moon landing was faked at a secret soundstage on Mars!

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I do find it amazing that it was literally easier to send humans to the moon than faking it in 1969

Like, isn’t that an astonishing fact?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

isnt there something about a smart watch today ahving more computational power than what took nasa to the moon, too?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Oh, I know this video!

I remember playing it for somebody, and you could tell they were trying so hard to disagree with it in their head. I imagine they still believe it was fake, but it was funny.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
2 points

That’d be it.

Honestly it’s super interesting to watch even if you know the moon landings happened for the history of tech he talks about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I feel like Captain Disillusion would have done a video on the moon landings if they were faked … unless he was in on it, hmm.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
permalink
report
parent
reply

memes

!memes@lemmy.world

Create post

Community rules

1. Be civil

No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politics

This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent reposts

Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No bots

No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads

No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.7K

    Posts

  • 53K

    Comments