You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
327 points

AI isn’t going to come with a new magic solution to global warming, it’s going to come with the same solutions we already have. Solutions which we should already be doing, but instead we’re listening to these fucks with too much money.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

It’s almost like these fucks don’t understand anything about the technology they’re touting

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Testing

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

AI will solve it if they give AI the wheel. And I’m sure one of the first thing it’ll do is eliminating all humans

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Do you think that they’ll listen to that then? No, they’ll just say that “the models are wrong” and continue to use up even more energy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It would just end up like in the Love death and robots episode When the Yogurt Took Over. They wouldn’t listen and just do their own thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Additionally, if AI actually gives us this answer, tge answer we have already now, will we as a global society actualky implement it, because it sounds inconvenient (at least for some) or will we say, hey the AI seems to have made a mistake.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

The only thing we should use AI for is to replace CEOs. AI can spit out inane bullshit at a fraction of the cost of a CEO.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That’s what I’ve been saying for years, we should start on the most expensive jobs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Of course it will. Simple: build a bunch of killer robots to exterminate 90% of humanity. Problem solved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah it’s not like our emissions ever grew 1000% per capita because we had no better plan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s an advanced AI. Surely it can do an Israel and remotely detonate the smartphones of the people it doesn’t need anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
155 points

It’s just an excuse to kick the can down the road further and continue making short term cash.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

Schmidt promises that these AI companies will make energy generation systems at least 15% more efficient or maybe even better, telling the audience that “that’s a lot of money for a utility.”

He’s not even trying to be subtle about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I would love to drop these guys into a post scarcity society where their money means jack shit and see how they react.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

If actual scientists were in charge, and maybe had some ideas that they weren’t certain would work but sounded promising, which could be theoretically tested with AI - there would be hope.
But none of these fuckers would allow anyone with more than half a brain cell near it, because “investment and growth and blablabla”

Then again, we could just do that with existing supercomputers and all these power hungry AI crap companies’ resources (I’m sure some supercomputers do get used for the modelling already)…instead of whatever the fuck they’re trying to do now.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.6K

    Posts

  • 115K

    Comments