The Green Party leader has hired a GOP consulting firm and worked with Trump-affiliated lawyers.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-76 points

Democrats: “If you don’t vote for Kamala you’re a Russian.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

If you actively go to the polls and while you’re there – instead of voting for Kamala Harris, the only viable candidate against Trump’s pro-Russia fascism – you choose to vote for a Russia-planted spoiler candidate and you live in a state that’s not safe red or safe blue, then yes, you are pro-Putin’s regime, and you unequivocally suck ass as a person.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points

That’s not very nice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-31 points

If you go cast your vote at the polls and you’re so braindead that you can’t fathom another third-party candidate is running without being a Russian agent in disguise, and you’re so scared that your candidate that you’ve convinced yourself is a perfect deity still might lose to a lunatic, then maybe you should re-evaluate why it is that people no longer trust Democrats blindly like you think they should.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

The only reason she loses is cause the peasants didn’t know what was good for the economy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

I think I love you a little bit more with each post. Have my upvote, brother!

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Let he who hasn’t dined at the same table as Putin cast the first stone.

What do you mean that’s everyone but Jill?

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Hey, Michael Flynn was there, too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-29 points

Using your logic, Obama is a Russian agent too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points
*

Quoting verbatim from a previous comment of mine because it’s literally not worth my time to come up with something original to the same exact stupid, worthless argument:

Third-party fringe candidate who gets less than 1% of the vote having dinner with Putin, Trump’s national security advisor who was later arrested for lying to the FBI about his ties to Russia, and several major Russian political figures before an election in which Russian interference provably helped Trump win.

The US president acting in an official capacity and meeting with the leader of a major world power.

“They’re the same picture.”

Boy, Russian bots Jill Stein stans are really tripping over each other to see who’s the biggest, dumbest idiot, aren’t they?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Edit: TheTechnician said it far better than I did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Leftists: The Green Parry isn’t a throwaway vote at all! Here’s my 40 paragraph manifesto that explains it all with YouTube links and op-ed opinion pieces to validate the proof!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points

Catch a glimpse of yourself in the mirror?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

“No you.”

Compelling argument. /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points

LMAO yep, that’s pretty much the sentiment in these parts lately. And people are only gonna get meaner about it too.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 9K

    Posts

  • 150K

    Comments