A French judge has reversed a ruling in the trial of a man who is accused of drugging his wife to sleep and recruiting dozens of men to abuse her for over a decade.

Lawyers for Gisèle Pelicot, 72, had earlier appealed against the judge’s initial decision to only show video of the crimes to lawyers and the jury.

She has waived her right to anonymity in the trial, enabling the shocking details of the case to be heard in public.

Her lawyers argued the video should be seen to draw attention to the use of drugs to commit sexual abuse. They hailed the latest ruling as a “victory”

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-58 points

Those weak French, amirite?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

They might have been steamrolled in back to back world wars, but they used to be a threat to takeover the world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They were in like 3rd place after British and Spanish.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

depends what time you’re talking about. napoleon fucked shit up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

No? The Spain’s heyday was a completely different time period from France and Britain’s, and during the Napoleonic wars France was first place and lost on foreign policy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Also internally they’ve had some of the most badass revolutions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

steamrolled in back to back world wars

The French definitely won WWI, do they not teach history in schools anymore?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

No, not really.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They didn’t win WW1, they just lost less hard than Germany.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The men who raped her were French too, and they outnumber her at least 50 to one, so your low level troll doesn’t even work the way you think it does…

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Was “Those weak French, amirite?” trolling, or was it making fun of people who falsely call French people ‘weak’ as a form of nationalistic bigotry?

I read it as the latter. “The French are still weak,” would be clear bigotry, the ‘amirite?’ makes me lean more towards making fun of them.

Of course, we can’t definitively say due to the lack of clear tone in written language.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You’re correct, evidently amirite wasnt sarcastic enough lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

Them absolutely rioting over a small increase in retirement age made me feel shame as an American. I love how willing the French are to remind their government of what happens when it gets out of line. Like, “don’t make us break out the guillotines.”

The French are not weak.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Nailed it friend

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Not American so this might be a stupid question, but does anyone actually say that? The French have serious islamophobia issues, but I don’t know anyone who would call them weak.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Yeah, its an American based stereotype AFAIK and the right winger trump types would be the most likely to spout it

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

At this point it’s entirely a self-referential joke. People bring it up to reference the stereotype itself, not to actually call the French cowards.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 9K

    Posts

  • 164K

    Comments