Democratic group files FEC complaint alleging GOP operatives illegally boosted Jill Stein in New Hampshire(www.bostonglobe.com)

At face value, I’d agree; for a second I even thought this was a redemption arc, but then I realized you just put this here to get her name additional visibility since your pro-Stein articles otherwise get drowned out with downvotes here. “Bad publicity is better than no publicity”.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone

-8 points

1 day ago

🤡

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP

-27 points

1 day ago

Ohhhh, ok, so now any anti-Stein articles I post are a concentrated effort for me to be pro-Stein because her name is mentioned. Even tho it’s negative article for her AND I’m not voting for her.

But somehow that means I am still getting paid in Russian money. Even for posting negative Stein/pro-democrat articles, right? So the russians pay people for pro-democrat articles, because…um…because…well heck, they just do.

That’s the theory you are working on? Ok, so what about the pro-Harris articles I post that don’t mention Jill Stein. How does that work with your going theory here?

And are all the other posters that have posted anti-Stein articles and comments getting paid as well? Oh wow, that’s gonna open a can of worms, friend…

And how would there be a “redemption arc”? I’m not voting for Stein. I like her, but I’m not voting for her. I’m still voting third party though, just not hers.

I’ve posted articles that are critical of Trump, Stein, and Harris, as well as articles praising each of them.

Do I get paid per article, or only the articles that just mention Jill Stein (even in a negative sense–according to you)? Or how does that even work when I post so many conflicting perspectives?!

I also created and mod a political news community where people have posted articles praising Harris, criticizing Stein, and trashing me.

https://lemmy.world/c/politicsunfiltered

Do I get paid for all the conflicting perspectives in that sub too? Or just this one?

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

TheTechnician27@lemmy.world

27 points

1 day ago

Come on, Monk. Everyone here is familiar with your long-winded Gish gallop comments at this point. I know Stein is doing the same song and dance she did in 2016, but that doesn’t mean you can’t innovate either.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

NegativeInf@lemmy.world

16 points

1 day ago

He even has a transracial sub. Legitimately just for posting inflammatory shit to conflate with the trans movement. Same shit as trying to list pedos under the lgbtq+ movement.

This boy is hot garbage.

permalink

report

parent

Show more comments

[ - ]

Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP

-27 points

1 day ago

So I still wanna know, do the other posters that post anti-Stein articles and posts, get paid? I mean, YOU are anti-Stein, so does that mean you are getting paid in russian money too? Now you are making me wonder about your motivations. Can you clarify?

I’m not even voting for her, but your talk about russian money, even with anti-Stein articles is making me wonder about you. Because I gave you pretty big list explaining stuff, and all you can do is mention Stein again. Hmmmm… Curious…

permalink

report

parent

Show more comments

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News