You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
7 points

It should be mandatory for any company to release that publicly anonymously.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

It’s often illegal for a company to disclose that they’ve been compelled to provide information to law enforcement. So many companies had a warrant canary which said they had not been served with a request for information.

Reddit for instance removed their warrant canary 8 years ago

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah, that’s the gag order aspect. I think we should have protection laws in place to determine how many times, say, in a quarter, a company is asked to comply with surveillance requests. Nothing to hurt any investigations, just to service us as due notice.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Cybersecurity

!cybersecurity@sh.itjust.works

Create post

c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.

THE RULES

Instance Rules

  • Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  • No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  • No Ads / Spamming.
  • No pornography.

Community Rules

  • Idk, keep it semi-professional?
  • Nothing illegal. We’re all ethical here.
  • Rules will be added/redefined as necessary.

If you ask someone to hack your “friends” socials you’re just going to get banned so don’t do that.

Learn about hacking

Hack the Box

Try Hack Me

Pico Capture the flag

Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !cybersecurity@lemmy.capebreton.social !securitynews@infosec.pub !netsec@links.hackliberty.org !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world

Community stats

  • 1.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 649

    Posts

  • 1.4K

    Comments