You’re getting emotional over something that doesn’t matter. Only 1% of people changed their views after this debate
Yes he did, which would normally be fantastic except you have to consider where he started.
Again, try to be a bit more level headed. Yes, he did well. Yes, about 1% changed who they are voting for (could be either d/r). People are voting between Harris or Trump. The VP debates just let you get to know the VP candidates a bit more.
Also, I’m not the one downvoting you
Again, try to be a bit more level headed.
Rich.
Tell this community to fuck off with their replies and down votes. I’m the only one speaking reason in a sea of dumbasses and you are trying to ping me for being unreasonable in the face of 20+ messages pinging me.
It’s a dog pile. I know these happen on the internet, but how about you recognize a dogpile and instead be a bit less accusatory (You’re getting emotional over something) under these circumstances.
I’m sorry I care about truth here. And your level of technicalities in the face of this is rich given the circumstances.
I’m not even saying Walz did bad or that anything was harmful to Harris. I’m simply pointing out that the Republicans are much happier with this debate than the liberals realize and y’all need to start becoming aware of the underlying problem with the meta-discussion.
If you are just cheering one side without thinking of the greater political story or the place our little discussion hasnin the world of political issues, you will be too ignorant to truly make lasting change.
Part of that is being honest about the performance of politicians on widely watched debates, and understanding the image projected upon your political opposition.
