warning: seriously nasty narcissism at length

archive: https://archive.is/eoXQj

this is a response to the post discussed in: https://awful.systems/post/220620

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
1 point

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

look, you can’t critique her narcissistic rant in any manner whatsoever until you’ve read it all line by line and the supporting non-evidence, or you’re just intellectually dishonest

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I saw some people say they’d spent ten hours reading this and trying to update their opinions. Tbf I might’ve spent nearly two hours making fun of them?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Whenever I see that they’re updating their opinions I imagine that’s where the micro dosing comes in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m sorry did you forget to evaluate the references included in the references included in the references? That is a bit dishonest, read the sequences twice and recite HPMOR once as penance, or increase your tithe by 1% by kissing the pinky ring.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Haven’t we all written a blog post with an “Acknowledgments” section at the end?

permalink
report
parent
reply

SneerClub

!sneerclub@awful.systems

Create post

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

[Especially don’t debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

Community stats

  • 364

    Monthly active users

  • 161

    Posts

  • 2.5K

    Comments