cross-posted from: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/22423685

EDIT: For those who are too lazy to click the link, this is what it says

Hello,

Sad news for everyone. YouTube/Google has patched the latest workaround that we had in order to restore the video playback functionality.

Right now we have no other solutions/fixes. You may be able to get Invidious working on residential IP addresses (like at home) but on datacenter IP addresses Invidious won’t work anymore.

If you are interested to install Invidious at home, we remind you that we have a guide for that here: https://docs.invidious.io/installation/..

This is not the death of this project. We will still try to find new solutions, but this might take time, months probably.

I have updated the public instance list in order to reflect on the working public instances: https://instances.invidious.io. Please don’t abuse them since the number is really low.

Feel free to discuss this politely on Matrix or IRC.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
92 points

And how are they going to make a living to keep producing videos?

I’d say ask them to join Nebula.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Paying Nebula subscriber here 🙋‍♂️

I can’t stand hearing people whine about wanting everything for free and how DARE people try to make a living so they can eat in between making videos!!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

That depends. If they only make a living with YT ads, then it’s going to be hard.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I guess I forgot things like Patreon which could be a valid option. Although I’m neither a fan of subscribing to specific creators nor am I particularly fond of Patreon.

With Nebula my perception is that I pay a monthly fee and they can figure out who gets what depending on whose videos I watched. I don’t need to be particular in my action on who to support.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Yes if a creator’s main living can be shifted into Patreon or their own independent subscription service, THEN you will see them move off of YT because it actually works against them at that point. Mark Spagnuolo aka The Wood Whisperer has made this transition. He’s been around years (decades?) with awesome quality woodworking content. He’s found independent sponsorships. He’s created his own subscription service and takes direct payments but also uses platforms like Patreon. He plays the social media game very well. He travels to trade shows and keeps up with a podcast. He is the gold standard for what it takes a creator to move off of YT and still make a living IMO. His wife is a driving force behind making the business work and I think it’s a full time job for her too and probably a staff of employees. Mark used YT in the early years to build an audience but he does very little at all on YT nowadays.

He also has very little out there now that is free 🤷‍♂️

You can’t have it both ways

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They also can use sponsors in the video, but that only works when you have enough views.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Nebula is a good option, but now you’ve created a paywall. Now only people who can afford it, can watch the content and what is to keep Nebula from upping the price of the subscription?

If ads is out of the question, then content creators need to use sponsors and patrons, if they want to make a living.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You could also send money via paypal or kofi if you don’t like subscriptions, if the creator has it set up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

About half the ads I see on YouTube are already within the videos they post. I wonder what the overall ratio is of YouTube ad revenue versus in-video ad revenue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Are you talking about sponsors? Because yes, that has nothing to do with YT ads.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I just want the videos no creator makes money on. I expect thats about 50% at least. Let’s start there. Put them in the Library of Congress and YouTube will be free to enshittify themselves into oblivion without complaint.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

All the people I watch on youtube make the majority of their money on patreon or twitch. Youtube is way too heavy handed with demonitization and copyright strikes to be a trutsworthy income source.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Same way they do on YT. Viewer contributions + sponsor spots + merch. They only miss out on ad revenue (which I concede is not insignificant).

Nebula is ok but I took 1 look at their privacy policy and passed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

So you want them to take a huge pay cut? To what benefit, just YoUTubE bAd?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

To literally everyone’s benefit except YouTube.

Viewer don’t have to submit themselves to Google’s horrific practices and policies, and creators get the freedom to post what they want without some 3rd party determining it’s illegal when it’s not and taking it down or giving all of their income to someone else.

I’m not telling anyone what to do, I’m just pointing out that it’s not impossible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Direct payment to creators seems like the most simple and efficient method.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Patreon and all the other services creators have at their disposal already.

Don’t think most Youtubers can make a living these days solely on YT as revenue, and are already exploring other avenues.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Nebula is cool and all, but at the end of the day, it’s still a commercial platform, and those do tend to enshittify and depend a lot on externalities.

As creators grow more dependent on Nebula, Sam and the team of original Nebula creators can wield more power and change the rules.

They already dictate the kind of content that is allowed - for example, Second Thought, one of the original creators behind Nebula, was asked to leave as he doesn’t agree to change public stance on Israeli-Palestinian conflict (he is pro-Palestine). This has suddenly left him without a source of revenue necessary for the production to expand, and has put him into debt.

Solution? Probably independent sponsorships that would go both on YouTube and PeerTube videos. Or a creator reward system like in Lbry/Odysee. Something that would allow to reward creators without going full commercial.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Remember when people posted on YouTube for fun? It’s only when it became a viable business that the platform turned to shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Ah yes, youtube now is just one big ad and sponsorship cesspool flooded with clickbait and misinformation and with highly privacy invasive protocol. Its a souless capitalisic corporate machine. I dont know why people would still use it. Just let youtube die.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I dont know why people would still use it.

Third-party clients, ad-block and sponsorblock are the only way I can still use it LOL

Also there simply aren’t any alternatives that aren’t alt-right cesspools or just awful to use…

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They can still post on YouTube.

It might take a tiny bit of their revenue away but I doubt it would make much of a dent, especially for creators that run mostly on patreon anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.2K

    Posts

  • 101K

    Comments