You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
43 points

Several of the victims were children. They went off in crowds. There was no way they could control that many devices with precision when they set them off all at once like that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

At least it was somewhat targeted, unlike Gaza.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

That particular pager was in a bag, against a person, pointed away from anyone or anything else. Not to mention anything of the second attack, which used much larger charges and started fires and blew out windows across Lebanon.

And anyway, a single example isn’t going to assuage anyone who has been reading reports of women and children dying from the attack.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

They’re also ignoring the literal terror being experienced by civilians who witnessed people’s legs and faces being blown off in public.

That’s terrorism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-25 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The mental gymnastics people will do to defend literal state sponsored terrorism.

And don’t waste your time, I actually know what those words mean.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-42 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

The fathers of these dead children will simply have to live with the terrible consequences of their involvement with antisemitic terror

So the children have to pay for their father’s crimes? This isn’t really a justification, and they don’t not care, now they have a real reason for retaliation—starting the cycle of hate all over again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-31 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

The kid’s blood is still on whoever triggered the devices hands. The child didn’t do anything.

Do you have a source stating that no bystanders were harmed? I can’t find anything making that claim.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Do you have a source stating that no bystanders were harmed?

They keep citing a tweet while others keep refuting what they’re saying with articles from BBC, NPR, and other news outlets. There’s no point in arguing with someone that can’t provide reputable sources for their claims.

*Edit: typo

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 8.9K

    Posts

  • 162K

    Comments