It’s like the Helldivers 2 incident, but for a single-player game, there’s no excuse.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
122 points

It’s not review bombing when there’s a legitimate problem!

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Is it not? What is “review bombing”? I thought it was just when a bunch of negative reviews were submitted in a short period of time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points
*

there’s probably no official definition, but you could argue it is supposed to refer to negative reviews that have nothing to do with the product. Like when a bunch of idiots gave Captain Marvel 1 star reviews because they hate Brie Larson.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

This is how I assume it would be used, but some people use it to mean “this got a lot of negative reviews right away”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Not going to lie, needing a PlayStation account feels pretty unrelated to the actual game to me. Akin to complaining about how something shipped on Amazon instead of, you know the actual product.

Your difficulties with needing a PlayStation account, like shipping, is going to wildly vary depending on location.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Review bombing is an intentional attack (e.g. someone posts a story about a shitty restaurant owner and everyone on the internet starts leaving negative reviews for that restaurant even though they’ve never been there). Just getting negative reviews organically for being bad is not review bombing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If a bunch of people are intentionally buying the game, reviewing and refunding without playing it, isn’t that the same?

If they’re reviewing it negatively and then enjoying the game without refunding, I’ve gotta laugh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

How much of a problem is it really though?

I don’t like it but eh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Its a huge problem, for a variety of reasons.

  1. It means Sony won’t sell the game in countries where they don’t allow PSN accounts.

  2. Their servers suck ass. I’m literally unable to play this game, even if I wanted to, because I get one generic server error after another when trying to make an account. This is the same reason it was originally removed from Helldivers 2.

  3. Sony has a horrific track record of data breaches.

  4. They’re collecting and selling data about you for profit.

  5. Its a completely arbitrary and anti-consumer requirement that has zero benefits to you as the consumer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-31 points
*
  1. It means Sony won’t sell the game in countries where they don’t allow PSN accounts.

That isn’t a problem for all the users that review the game though.

  1. Their servers suck ass. I’m literally unable to play this game, even if I wanted to, because I get one generic server error after another when trying to make an account. This is the same reason it was originally removed from Helldivers 2.

I don’t know about that since I have never connected my PSN account. The only game I own which supports it is Ghost of Tsushima and I haven’t connected my account to that game.

  1. Sony has a horrific track record of data breaches.

  2. They’re collecting and selling data about you for profit.

  3. Its a completely arbitrary and anti-consumer requirement that has zero benefits to you as the consumer.

Fair enough but I don’t think it’s actively anti consumer, I place that bar higher than this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Publishers are trying to exclude “review bombing” because they think it’s just social manipulation, while just casually ignoring that there are actual problems with the game. Review bombing used to be something else, but now be wary of it because it’s usually them just trying to discredit actual concerns.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You can have actual concerns without abusing the review function, though. If you don’t own and never planned to play the game and are “reviewing” it because something on the internet made you angry, then that just discredits the actual review platform as a whole.

Reviews should be an actual review, not a tweet reply. If you haven’t actually played the game, don’t review it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

How much of a problem it is will vary by how much it impacts and upsets a customer. For you, sounds like it’s not that big of an issue.

But the fact that they pulled out the “review bombing” exscuse means that it qualifies as a problem to a significant percentage of customers.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Gaming

!gaming@lemmy.zip

Create post

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

  • No NSFW content

You can see Lemmy.zip’s rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:

  • Respectful Communication: We strive for positive, constructive dialogue and encourage all members to engage with one another in a courteous and understanding manner.
  • Inclusivity: Embracing diversity is at the core of our community. We welcome members from all walks of life and expect interactions to be conducted without discrimination.
  • Privacy: Your privacy is paramount. Please respect the privacy of others just as you expect yours to be treated. Personal information should never be shared without consent.
  • Integrity: We believe in the integrity of speech and action. As such, honesty is expected, and deceptive practices are strictly prohibited.
  • Collaboration: Whether you’re here to learn, teach, or simply engage in discussion, collaboration is key. Support your fellow members and contribute positively to shared learning and growth.

If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


Community stats

  • 2.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.6K

    Posts

  • 2.3K

    Comments