This likely means that the knife never existed in the first place, and was made up by the cops in order to justify shooting into a crowd.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
101 points

Man, even the article can’t get the story straight…

“NYPD can’t find knife”…

“the department put out a request seeking the public’s help to find the knife”…

“a man believed to have swiped the suspect’s knife”…

“Video circulating on social media appears to show the man scoop up the knife”…

OK, that’s all consistent…

“the NYPD posted on X that the knife had been “recovered” following the police shooting.”

Um, no.

"Below is a picture of the weapon recovered from the scene of today’s incident. pic.twitter.com/D3AZjNr4cL

— NYPD NEWS (@NYPDnews) September 15, 2024"

Recovered? But then…

“Now, they are seeking the individual potentially in possession of the weapon”… Did you or did you not recover the weapon?

“the now-missing knife”… OK, so NOT recovered.

permalink
report
reply
84 points

The current position of the NYPD is that some random black guy wandering past a crime scene after the cops shot up a crowd decided to steal the knife that the cops considered to be key evidence. This is, to put it mildly, somewhat less credible than the claim that a crow tried to steal a murder weapon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Honestly I find Russian general’s belief in a 3 day offensive more credible than that.

Nearly 1000 days later, even.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

“Hey, free knife”

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

The police don’t want you to know this, but the knives at crime scenes are free. You can take them home with you. I have 458 knives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Of course they say the guy was black. 🙄

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

“the department put out a request seeking the public’s help to find the knife”

Translation: “We’d love someone to come forward with a knife and claim it’s from the crime scene, so we can cover our asses.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

The police have not been a credible source of information since the BLM protests. I’m sure they lied all the time before that too but that period really put a light on how much they lie. It’s their first instinct in any situation, just deny anything wrong happened and cast aspersions on the victim’s character.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Police unions are terrorist orgs

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Police have never really been a source of credible information. We just have the tools and technology to reveal when they are lying now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah, that’s probably true.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

By “recovered” the cops unironically mean the opposite of recovered - as in a non-police person has taken the knife.

I can’t tell from just this article if I should lean more to standard cop butchering of language or intentional deception.

EDIT: Or not? I found another article that says they retracted that statement about recovering the knife - that it was the wrong knife. That definitely doesn’t make me less suspicious…

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

“Oh, no, not THAT knife, it’s a different knife… from Canada… you don’t know it…”

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Purposely creating confusion

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Shouldn’t the knive have a shadow?

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.7K

    Posts

  • 116K

    Comments