You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-29 points

If it weren’t for twitter, i wouldn’t have even known there was another attempt on Trump. I don’t sort Lemmy by new and there was nothing in the top posts about it (that I saw, at least) until HOURS after it happened. None of the other social media sites I use showed anything for a while either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

What did you gain by knowing unconfirmed information a few hours earlier? Did you need to act on that “information” that quickly?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

People who view policymaking as “entertainment” are the reason we have Trump in the first place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points

I would rather have my entertainment sooner, as opposed to never.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

In this case it’s not “never”, I don’t use twitter and saw this news on Lemmy this morning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This isn’t some fucking game. Here let me make it more concrete and personal for your pea-brain:

I will find it very entertaining when your family and friends are lined up and shot to death while you watch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

You might consider reading some real news, vetted and produced by professional journalists. Twitter is not news source, neither is Reddit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I typically do, twitter happened to be the first place I saw any information about it, nothing else tipped me off about it happening until then.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

You could simply open a news site a couple times a day. They all had the assassination attempt up pretty quickly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I didn’t know it happened. Why would I have thought to go looking for something I don’t know about?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I didn’t know it happened either, but I check the news a couple times a day to see if anything happened.

It seems like you’re being disingenuous. You said you need Twitter to find out about things like the assassination attempt, so obviously you check Twitter, but the concept of checking the news is apparently strange to you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

He didn’t mean to check if there had been an attempt to eradicate Trump specifically, he meant open a news app occasionally, as one does a social media app.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

“Don’t believe initial reporting about any dramatic event. The rush to be first often overrides the responsibility to try to be correct. As with any event like this, some of this information is likely to change as more information becomes available.”

https://youtu.be/sgpYzFTtJug?feature=shared

In any case, I heard about the attempt shortly after I started scrolling through lemmy last night, so from my pov the information had gotten to me in a timely manner.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

nothing in the top posts about it (that I saw, at least) until HOURS after it happened.

in other words, since it can be assumed that you’re checking multiple social medias often enough for “HOURS” to make such a huge difference, then basically your life is driven by FOMO, and you see no problem with that.

kudos for the honesty at least. you do you and keep supporting that nazi safespace

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Pretty glad that all of these responses are assumptions about my character just because I somehow managed to not see that someone tried to merc trump again for the whole day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

you’re trying to defend twitter with “i need it for news”

that says a lot about your character. no assuming needed

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I knew here within 30 minutes. Also on Bluesky. Also on any major news source.

If you’re not finding the stuff I think that’s on your

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The ap app notified me so you can’t be trying that hard to replace twitter

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s such a non-event that even the Conservative lemmy didn’t post about it until yesterday.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

Its so funny that lemmy thinks its better than reddit with all these reddit ass responses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Biggest bunch of self righteous blowhards I’ve ever seen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Go complain about it on Twitter.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 189K

    Comments