You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
6 points

I’m normally in the camp that copyleft prevents enterprise adoption, and therefore limits users/contributors… but in this case I agree. I’d like browsers to be copyleft. I’d like to be able to see what kind of sketchy shit Edge and Chrome are throwing on top of Chromium and have it out in the open.

Question for the free software community…

If I used a headless version of a copyleft browser as part of an automated testing suite for proprietary enterprise software, does that violate the copyleft license?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Free Software

!freesoftware@lemmy.zip

Create post

What is free software?

Free software is software that respects the 4 software freedoms. The 4 freedoms are

  • The freedom to run the run the program
  • The freedom to study the source code
  • The freedom to modify the source code
  • The freedom to distribute modified versions of the source code

Please note: Free software does not relate to monetary price. Free software can be sold or gratis (no cost)

Rules:

  1. Please keep on topic
  2. Follow the Lemmy.zip rules
  3. No memes
  4. No “circle jerking” or inflammatory posts
  5. No discussion of illegal content

Please report anything you believe to violate the rules and be sure to include rhetoric on why you think it should be removed.

If you would like to contest mod actions please DM me with your rational as to why you feel that the relivant mod action should be reversed. Remember to use rhetoric and to site any relevant sources. You will only get one chance to argue your point and continued harassment will result in a ban.

Overall this community is pretty laid back and none if the things list above normally are an issue.

Community stats

  • 139

    Monthly active users

  • 84

    Posts

  • 170

    Comments

Community moderators