You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
0 points

I hope this makes sense

No, it doesn’t.

Trump and his people are calling for mass arrests in the US and the destruction of Palestine.

In 1968 a lot of voters felt they couldn’t stand having Humphrey as President. They let Nixon win.

You vote for Biden and you can vote for someone else in 2028. You let Trump win and voting might be off the table completely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

Wait…

So you give an example of when the Dems ran a candidate further to the right than their voters want…

Which resulted in the Republican winning…

And you blame voters?

And now, when the Dem party is running a candidate further than the right than Dem voters want…

You’re already blaming the voters?

You still haven’t realized the solution is running candidates that appeal to voters?

Did you forget Bill Clinton and Barack Obama happened in the middle?

You charismatic candidates who ran progressive campaigns that led to decisive wins?

You vote for Biden and you can vote for someone else in 2028

Lol, that’s what they said about 2016, and 2020…

It’s what you’re saying about 2024…

But next year, next year will definitely be different?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Lol, that’s what they said about 2016, and 2020…

So, you forgot about the January 6 coup attempt?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Nope.

trump will do it again in fact. Every election he doesn’t win is going to see a 1/6 like event, or at least that’s what we need to be ready for.

Which is why beating him is so important, and why Biden needs to stop caring about what people who will never vote D want, and start caring about the people who will never vote R want.

Because the people who go back and forth between the parties are statistically insignificant.

But you keep jumping around a lot, Everytime I explain one point, you pivot to a new one about why Biden shouldn’t be held to any standards and trump has to be stopped.

I agree trump has to be stopped.

But even from your historical example, the way we do that isn’t running a candidate more conservative than what voters want.

The way we do that so running candidates like Obama and Bill. Not Humphries, Biden, or Hillary.

2020 was the lucky exception, not a new rule.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

You two seem to be somewhat talking at cross purposes.

As far as I can see, what they’re saying is that the Dem candidate needs to apeal to Dem voters and those who could be persuaded to vote Dem, to ensure their vote. If Biden turns enough of them off and they don’t vote he risks losing. On the other hand dyed in the wool Republican voters probably can’t be turned, so there’s no point trying to apeal to them.

You seem to be saying that not voting for Biden, despite him being unpopular, risk letting Trump in. That is also true, and it is vital that Trump is stopped, they’re just pointing out that that is easier if Biden listens to his base, rather than population wide surveys.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 7.1K

    Posts

  • 125K

    Comments