1.6K

Earbuds(reddthat.com)

posted
by
Avatar
101@reddthat.com
in
Avatar
microblogmemes@lemmy.world
500 comments
hidereport

We used to have earbuds that don’t need to be charged because they had a headphone jack, didn’t get lost so easily because they had a cord attached to a headphone jack, never lost the bluetooth connection because they had a headphone jack, and they cost less because they had a headphone jack. https://bsky.app/profile/daisyfm.bsky.social/post/3l3mfjc6sn62k

Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
Avatar
xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
-1 points

But all of those arguments are still valid, even if you make the assumption that it was all an evil scheme to make you buy some headphones

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
UnityDevice@startrek.website
3 points

They’re not valid, they’re excuses which are provably wrong. Samsung will currently sell you a phone with a jack which is ip68 waterproof, has a milspec durability rating and it costs a whopping €250. So clearly the jack is not a design limitation in any of those ways.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Microblog Memes

!microblogmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, Twitter X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.5K

    Posts

  • 46K

    Comments

Community moderators