You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context

Wait… so you believe in spoiler candidates, but not that Jill Stein is a spoiler?

Because you fight pretty hard when anyone calls Stein a spoiler siphoning votes from the Democratic party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

The very idea of a β€œspoiler” is a tool used by those clinging to the duopoly to scare people into submission, to keep us from voting our conscience.

You are correct that I don’t buy into that narrative, but in this community, where the term is tossed around like a weapon, I use the vernacular to communicate effectively.

Jill Stein isn’t a spoilerβ€”she’s a voice for the people, challenging a corrupt system that fears true democracy. And she has my vote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Which set of people is she a voice for, though, I wonder?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

The very idea of a β€œspoiler” is a tool used by those clinging to the duopoly to scare people into submission, to keep us from voting our conscience.

No, it’s a tool that exists in some flawed voting systems, recognized by political scientists and used by bad actors.

You are correct that I don’t buy into that narrative, but in this community, where the term is tossed around like a weapon, I use the vernacular to communicate effectively.

Why I distrust you, in particular, is that you only recognize the spoiler vernacular, and only post these articles, when they’re about β€œspoilers for the Trump campaign.” You never do the same for Democrats.

Jill Stein isn’t a spoilerβ€”she’s a voice for the people, challenging a corrupt system that fears true democracy.

We disagree. She’s a spoiler, except unlike the person in the article you posted, she doesn’t have the moral fortitude to admit it. Her position on Ukraine makes her a complete non-starter for me; even if we did have approval or ranked choice voting, she’d wouldn’t get any vote from me. The Greens need to dump her idiot ass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points
*

Why I distrust you, in particular, is that you only recognize the spoiler vernacular, and only post these articles, when they’re about β€œspoilers for the Trump campaign.” You never do the same for Democrats.

I’m not sure why that makes you so angry. Remember when everyone used to accuse me of only posting Green Party stuff to β€œspoil” the election and help Trump win? It was like they thought my whole mission was to help Trump win! Actually, people still accuse me of that! Lmao!

But I also post other party news, and you are mad because I used different wording?! lol

Bruh, I post news about third parties.

I’m focused on challenging the entire duopoly, not just one side of it.

If you’ve only seen me call out one party, that’s on you, but my goal is to shine a light on the hypocrisy and corruption of both Democrats AND Republicans.

Both sides are terrified of true alternatives, and that’s exactly why third parties need our support.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points
*

she’d wouldn’t get any vote from me

And I totally support and respect your right to think that and vote for who you want to. As I’m sure you support and respect my right to vote for who I want to. Right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What has Jill Stein ever done for the people? Continually running and losing isn’t a public service. She’s absolutely worthless and there is a reasonable expectation that this will be so for the rest of her life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Continually running and losing isn’t a public service.

Then you have nothing to fear or be angry about. I mean, she doesn’t do anything, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to β€œMom! He’s bugging me!” and β€œI’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

β€’ Register To Vote

β€’ Citizenship Resource Center

β€’ Congressional Awards Program

β€’ Federal Government Agencies

β€’ Library of Congress Legislative Resources

β€’ The White House

β€’ U.S. House of Representatives

β€’ U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

β€’ News

β€’ World News

β€’ Business News

β€’ Political Discussion

β€’ Ask Politics

β€’ Military News

β€’ Global Politics

β€’ Moderate Politics

β€’ Progressive Politics

β€’ UK Politics

β€’ Canadian Politics

β€’ Australian Politics

β€’ New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 188K

    Comments