You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

How is nuclear a bad idea? It’s one of the best options. Sure it’s slow and expensive, but once it’s up and running, it’s safe, and even less radioactive than coal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Because solar and wind can be deployed much faster. You rather easily have a decade of extra coal or gas emissions, if you built nuclear today.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Two things can be built at once.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Can be, won’t be tho

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Sure, but why would you built a nuclear power plant, when you are faster in having a clean grid with wind and solar. The workers building the npp could built more wind and solar after all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

No. The total amount of money available for energy research and construction is a given amount. If it’s better spent on solar and wind that’s it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

!climate@slrpnk.net

Create post

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Community stats

  • 4.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.6K

    Posts

  • 8.9K

    Comments

Community moderators