You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
5 points

Because solar and wind can be deployed much faster. You rather easily have a decade of extra coal or gas emissions, if you built nuclear today.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Two things can be built at once.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Sure, but why would you built a nuclear power plant, when you are faster in having a clean grid with wind and solar. The workers building the npp could built more wind and solar after all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

So just do both at the same time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Can be, won’t be tho

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

No. The total amount of money available for energy research and construction is a given amount. If it’s better spent on solar and wind that’s it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

!climate@slrpnk.net

Create post

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Community stats

  • 4.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.5K

    Posts

  • 8.9K

    Comments

Community moderators