Long-term carrier lock-in could soon be a thing of the past in America after the FCC proposed requiring telcos to unlock cellphones from their networks 60 days after activation.

FCC boss Jessica Rosenworcel put out that proposal on Thursday, saying it would encourage competition between carriers. If subscribers could simply walk off to another telco with their handsets after two months of use, networks would have to do a lot more competing, the FCC reasons.

“When you buy a phone, you should have the freedom to decide when to change service to the carrier you want and not have the device you own stuck by practices that prevent you from making that choice,” Rosenworcel said.

Carrier-locked devices contain software mechanisms that prevent them from being used on other providers’ networks. The practice has long been criticized for being anti-consumer.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
92 points

OK, now ban bootloader locking next.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Don’t Sammy do and apple do it… Not even carriers?

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Pretty sure Samsung does it to appease carriers since they sell unlocked snapdragon variants elsewhere

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

For quite a long time now, it’s been the case that if your vendor makes this hard as is, a carrier on top of that will make it considerably worse. As an example, take a look at older Samsung devices, that all needed special-tailored roms for each carrier variant

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

If you buy a phone from Verizon its perma locked for no reason

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Oh there’s a reason. Hotspot bypass being a big one I’d wager, the other being making it significantly harder to avoid ads

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I sent the FTC a letter asking them to look into the practices of bootloader locking. They did they they would consider looking into it

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

How did you go about doing that? I wanted to ask them about being able to replace the primary bootloader, including signing keys for any device that a user has paid for, which is a step above bootloader unlocking.

Kind of like installing coreboot or libreboot on a PC/laptop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s one command to unlock so what’s the point?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

…on OEM unlocked devices that you buy upfront and pay full price for. Buy one second hand? Fuck you. Get one through a carrier? Fuck you. Get a gift from a family member who has upgraded? You guessed it, fuck you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I wasn’t aware that anything can block unlocking it. Learned something new thanks

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.1K

    Posts

  • 130K

    Comments