You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
20 points

Now I am curious, somebody explain. if it just stopped burning, would we know after 8 mins, if we lived on the opposite side?

permalink
report
reply
54 points

Moon would “disappear” when it no longer reflected Sun’s light.

It would also start getting very cold fast

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

It would probably take more than a day for the cold to be so intense that you can’t possibly explain with some normal local phenomenon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

The moon might be on the daylight side, so we wouldn’t necessarily observe that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Any visible planet or asteroid would. So some stars would also appear to blink out, but those would take longer to blink out. So the moon would go after 8 minutes, Jupiter would take 43 minutes to stop receiving light, and another 35-52 minutes to disappear for earth depending on orbital locations.

Presumably we would get something on radio/tv/internet from the side facing the sun once they realized it, that of course being only if they hadn’t already been eradicated by a horrific shockwave caused by whatever event caused the sun to vanish before they had a chance to report what they saw, because supernovae tend to travel at very close to the speed of light, so there wouldn’t be much time for them to react.

And if this is a supernova, you might just have time to grok what happened before the planet was obliterated under your feet from the shockwave.

So I guess… chances are we would just barely understand what happened before we were gone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

It’s kind of odd that it doesn’t matter for a single human whether they die from sudden car accident or get obliterated by supernova. Both events feel equal

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Does heat travel at the speed of light? I just realized I have no idea how the heat from the sun travels to earth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

The “heat” IS the radiation. So, yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Someone correct me if I’m missing some nuance here, but heat doesn’t get transferred directly through space because heat is vibrating molecules and space is a vacuum. The sun radiates (speed O’ light). A lot of that radiation just reflects off the earth (or we wouldn’t be able to see it), but a lot of it gets absorbed. THAT’s when it’s converted into heat energy. It’s also why the greenhouse effect is a global phenomena: light energy comes in across the vacuum relatively easily, turns to heat on Earth instead of being reflected, heat energy cannot escape as easily as light energy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

When there is a total solar eclipse, the temperature does drop dramatically. But it might not be detectable on the other side right away for sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes, we have conduction, convection, and radiative heat transfer. Vacuum insulates the first two, it’s the light from the sun that heats us up

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I wonder how cold how fast.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It wouldn’t really be faster than normal nighttime cooling. However, that cooling would continue instead of having the sun to start warming stuff up in the morning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

It takes 8 minutes for the light to travel from the sun to Earth. Because light in a vacuum travels faster than anything, including information, we would not and could not know it had disappeared for 8 minutes. This means Earth would continue to follow its orbit around a non-existent sun for 8 minutes because the Sun’s gravity would still be acting on the Earth.

If it was nighttime, you wouldn’t notice the sudden lack of sunlight (other than if it was a full moon) but you’d almost certainly notice the change in gravity.

Edit: actually, you wouldn’t feel any difference in gravity or experience any change of acceleration. What you would experience is a very tiny vibration, of 1 million push notifications being sent to your phone from the other side of the planet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Interesting, so you are saying light is faster than gravity?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Equal to speed of light in vacuum

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_gravity

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

light speed = gravity speed

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

From an AI, so take with some salt:

Yes, gravity is believed to travel at the speed of light.

According to Einstein’s theory of general relativity, the effects of gravity propagate through spacetime at the speed of light. This means that if a massive object were to suddenly change its position, the gravitational effects would not be felt instantaneously by objects around it, but would instead spread outward at the speed of light.

This is in contrast to the classical Newtonian view of gravity, which treated it as an instantaneous force. Einstein’s theory showed that gravity, like other forms of electromagnetic radiation, obeys the speed limit set by the speed of light.

Experimental evidence, such as observations of binary pulsars, has confirmed that gravity does indeed propagate at the speed of light, as predicted by general relativity. This is a crucial aspect of our modern understanding of the nature of gravity and its relationship to the fabric of spacetime.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

I don’t think you’d actually “notice” the gravity.

Earth would still retain it’s mass, and we’re much closer to it, so it’s lesser mass acts much more on us than the sun’s greater.

Though, the earth would stop orbiting the sun and travel on a mostly tangential path travel nearly radially away from where the sun was, instead of the elliptical path it currently travels.

This is a very interesting physics question that I may look into further. Specifically what would the theoretical acceleration be, due to the lack of the sun? Is it above a humans level of perception?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Gravitysimulator.org has an interface you can simulate what happens, though it’s timeframe is on the order of days. Not seconds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Why would it travel radially away? The resulting gravity wave from a disappearing stun much push the Earth a little, but changing its orbit that drastically would mostly destroy Earth anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

you’d almost certainly notice the change in gravity.

Really? can you actually percieve the sun gravity? Do you mean that we would get like a tsunami beause of the tidal effect? Now I kinda want a documentary about this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s weird to say that light travels faster than information, because light is information. In other words, top speed for information IS speed of light.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think that’s just the wording. My interpretation of that is any satellite or space probe sending back readings to Earth wouldn’t be faster than the sun visually disappearing from the sky. Even with the information being transmitted at the speed of light, there’s always going to be some sort of processing delay, along with the limited bandwidth of the transmission.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science Memes

!science_memes@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.2K

    Posts

  • 51K

    Comments