You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-7 points

Above all, Joe Biden’s allies wanted him to demonstrate strength and energy on the debate stage to help put to rest questions about the 81-year-old Democrat’s physical and mental acuity.

But on the biggest stage in U.S. politics on Thursday night, Biden did not meet their modest expectations.

And by the end of the 90-minute showdown, the Democratic president’s allies — party strategists and rank-and-file voters alike — descended into all-out panic following a debate performance punctuated by repeated stumbles, uncomfortable pauses, and a quiet speaking style that was often difficult to understand. Publicly and privately, Democrats questioned whether the party could or should replace him as the party’s presidential nominee against the 78-year-old Republican former President Donald Trump this fall.

"I’m not the only one whose heart is breaking right now. There’s a lot of people who watched this tonight and felt terribly for Joe Biden,” former Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill said on MSNBC. “I don’t know if things can be done to fix this.”

What we can do is run a better candidate before it’s too late.

The convention isn’t for over a month, and the DNC has been very open about how they can just nominate anyone they want.

We’re only stuck with Biden because Biden and the people he put in charge of the DNC would rather risk trump than Biden step aside.

permalink
report
reply
5 points
*

We’re only stuck with Biden because Biden and the people he put in charge of the DNC would rather risk trump than Biden step aside.

We’re stuck with Biden precisely because the DNC doesn’t want to risk Trump, and the incumbent advantage is significant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

and the incumbent advantage is significant.

An incumbent advantage helps but isn’t an automatic win.

Biden’s poll numbers are abysmal for Dem voters. The incumbent advantage likely won’t overcome his unpopularity.

And when the most common reason his supporters give us just “he’s not trump” then literally any Dem candidate has that too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Which candidate do you suggest, givesomefucks?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s kind of amazing how he’ll engage with every single response to his comments… except the ones asking who he thinks the Democratic party should nominate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Did we even watch the same debate? Trump is a rambling moron. Biden is old, that is a very real concern, but he wasn’t incoherent even a little bit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What?

When asked about abortion, Biden started ranting about illegal immigrants murdering women…

And for an example used an instance where we don’t know who the murderers are, but right wing media keeps claiming it was immigrants.

Like, this isn’t just you and me bub.

Feel free to provide a source from literally any major news organization claiming Biden did well and was coherent.

You’re currently commenting on one about the opposite, but I can find more if you want

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

When asked about abortion, Biden started ranting about illegal immigrants murdering women…

That is an outright lie. I’m not a fan of Biden for different reasons, but let’s stick to the truth.

I actually watched the debate. Its clear you didnt. Biden was coherent, even trump was for the most part coherent, he just made stuff up constantly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

You didn’t watch the debate. You were on 4chan apparently. This is the same exact thing those chuds are saying over there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Trump didn’t answer a single question with anything other than, “I’m rubber; you’re glue.” Biden was stumbly but he at least answered questions and you 90% knew what he was talking about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Can you imagine what it would look like if they chose someone like Jon Stewart instead? How a debate like that would have gone? A guy can dream…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I mean yea, but that’s not really fair to him. Being president seems like a terrible burden.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The problem is that the DNC would never go for him or anyone like him, because he’s not a blatant neoliberal.

If they swap, it’ll be someone like Newsom.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Voters choose the candidate in the primary, not “the DNC”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Just anyone with more charisma than a bowl of cold oatmeal.

If nothing matters except beating trump, why arent we coalescing around a candidate Dem voters want so that we’ll get as much votes against trump as possible

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The problem is “a candidate dem voters want” doesn’t have any obvious choices.

Like Harris isn’t that popular, but the optics of skipping over a black woman when the VP would typically be the heir apparent? You think Gavin Newsom would be a good choice? Californians don’t have a lot of good things to say about him right now. I haven’t seen a lot of other names floated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Which candidate do you suggest, givesomefucks?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Jon Stewart is someone I would actually look forward to giving my vote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Would he have to leave the Daily Show though?

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 7.1K

    Posts

  • 125K

    Comments