Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee for president, fired back at pro-Palestinian protesters of Israel’s war in Gaza as they interrupted her speech during a Wednesday night campaign rally in Detroit.

“You know what? If you want Donald Trump to win, then say that. Otherwise, I’m speaking,” Harris said with a long stare, drawing loud cheers from supporters in the crowd before chants of, “Not going back!”

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-13 points

Well, Mrs. Vice President, if you don’t want my vote in November, then say that.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

The solution cannot be “don’t vote and let the other guys win” tho right? Kamala could have responded so much better, but that means we roll over?

I just can’t get behind this take. It’s like the religious people who actively seek out the end of the world so they can all be raptured.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The solution cannot be “don’t vote and let the other guys win” tho right?

It isn’t. Keep trying. If she keeps refusing, vote for an anti-genocide candidate like Jill Stein.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Oh I’m sorry,

*The solution cannot be “vote for someone who has no chance and let the other guys win” tho right?

Seriously who the hell is Jill Stein? I bet if you asked most Americans they would have no clue. Can we have an ounce of realism here? We’re 3 months out from this election and finally got someone who is competitive with Trump. Jill Stein is not winning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t think you mean to say a movement that wants to end genocide is like those who seek the end of the world…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

We can make comparisons to the behaviors of those within two different groups without comparing the goals of those groups. Ultimately they’re both self destructive and not going to accomplish their goals.

And because it has to be said, of course I’m against the genocide. I do not think the person I responded to (and others like them) will ultimately be effective in ending it

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

My theory is that religious people want that, so they get into heaven without dying first. They are just afraid of dying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The solution cannot be “don’t vote and let the other guys win” tho right?

That is the risk the Kamala campaign is apparently willing to take.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

We’re talking about your personal actions, but yeah go off king. Take no responsibility, your actions mean nothing

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Regardless of what people do, either vote or not vote, a Democrat or Republican will be President next term. The only choice people have is if they want to affect which one it will be.

Is the argument that both parties will be the same? Is US support of Israel the only issue to consider?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

My point is vote Democrat

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I mean…Do you want trump to win?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Does she?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

You’re assuming her completely condemning Isreal would help her win the election but I don’t think it’s as simple as that. There’s still a massive voting block of hard core Isreal supporters in the US.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Nobody wants Trump to win. Kamala doesn’t want Trump to win. Which is why this reaction is so dismaying. It’s her actions that are helping Trump to win, not the protesters’.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
*

No. That’s why I’m frustrated with Kamala for alienating anti-genocide voters so far.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Sure, but who are you voting for? Or don’t you take any responsibility for your own actions like so many others who blame her for their vote?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

poor baby. can’t have what you want, so, you’ll just doom palestine because, <pouts>

go cry

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

There is no room for these things to be a topic of conversation if Trump wins. This way of thinking has no path to resolving the problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Same excuse every four years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

That assumes that things haven’t changed, and that Trump doesn’t represent the backlash to that change. The Dems don’t change things as fast as you would like, but why is back pedaling better than that? I swear, this whole line of reasoning sounds like some astroturfing movement to get liberals to skip the election. The republicans only win when voter counts are low. You are talking like you want Trump to win.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Dems need to learn kicking the can down the road doesn’t work when scientists say the road ends in like 40 years unless we change big things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You must not have heard about the trolley problem. I’m sure if I logically explain why you should ignore the deaths of your family members you would go vote. /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

iF yOu WaNt DoNaLd TrUmP tO wIn

permalink
report
parent
reply

United States | News & Politics

!usa@lemmy.ml

Create post

Community stats

  • 3.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.1K

    Posts

  • 5.9K

    Comments