You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

lol I comprehend my own sources just fine, you just don’t like the information.

The link provided is from the very department that defines and enforces minimum wage law. I’m pretty sure they know what the fuck it’s meant for, as well as the President who led its advancement through congress.

Once again, not liking something doesn’t mean the information is wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

lol I comprehend my own sources just fine, you just don’t like the information.

Strange that you can’t provide the quote that proves your point

The link provided is from the very department that defines and enforces minimum wage law. I’m pretty sure they know what the fuck it’s meant for, as well as the President who led its advancement through congress.

Your literacy issues strike again, I have not disputed the accuracy of the link just the information you claim is in there is not.

Once again you have not produced a quote of the information you claim proves your point. Here is a link to my source that totally proves everything I said. https://www.wikipedia.org/

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Hahahaha you can’t even be bothered to send an actual relevant link, or recite your actual problems with the sources because there is no problem, you just don’t like them.

You’re so bad at this you’re single-handedly proving why we need a better education system in this country, because you’re so confidently incorrect it’s obvious you don’t even know how to have a good faith discussion with someone.

You can’t just throw away a source because you don’t like the information and won’t read it. That just makes you stubborn and ill-informed. 🤣

I’m not your mom. You want a bedtime story? Go read it yourself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Hahahaha you can’t even be bothered to send an actual relevant link, or recite your actual problems with the sources because there is no problem, you just don’t like them

I see my point of linking to Wikipedia.org went right over your head, I should have expected that.

You can’t just throw away a source because you don’t like the information and won’t read it. That just makes you stubborn and ill-informed. 🤣

I did read it and there’s nothing showing FDR supporting a $0.40 rate and it being opposed for the $0.40 rate, there were a whole host of other reasons but not the rate.

I’m not your mom. You want a bedtime story? Go read it yourself.

I see you’re back to claiming you have evidence but refuse to provide it because … reasons. It’s so strange that this constantly happens to you, it’s almost like you’re full of shit and can’t back it up.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Conservative

!conservative@lemm.ee

Create post

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee’s rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don’t reply to it.

Community stats

  • 1.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 515

    Posts

  • 3.5K

    Comments