A European initiative is now underway for videogame preservation and consumer protections against publishers “killing games.”

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
42 points

I could see this leading to standardizing and outsourcing multiplayer services, which would be interesting.

That being said, before that happens, as a developer I’d be like: here’s a zip file with all of our proprietary stuff ripped out. Have fun spending the next few months getting it to work well. Congratulations, you’re now supporting a game that did poorly enough for us to drop it.

But seriously, go sign it. Long term it should be a good thing.

permalink
report
reply
16 points
*

Have fun spending the next few months getting it to work well.

judging by some fan mods out there, i think many people would genuinely have a blast doing this (and do a much better job than the original developers)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Oh, it would be super fun if you’re into the game, as long as it doesn’t become a job, which it might.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Sweats in GameSpy

Honestly, it would probably lead to the major distributors also having control over that… So I guess one more yacht for Gaben?

Kinda funny that people on this platform consider that centralization of the service would be a good thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

On one hand, I’d love to see drop in replacements for steam services, especially something that could be selfhosted. On the other hand, if steam services ever goes down, there are metric megatons of reasons to reverse engineer a solution. The centralisation could end up being standardisation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I was thinking more of an open API of how the game interacts with multiplayer services, so that in theory anyone could setup a server, or server services. In practice I completely agree with you though. Nobody wants to do the whole “Oh wait, you’re on that server? I have an account with that other server” thing. Steam, or some other party, would just become the defacto place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The proposal is precisely about not letting your snake ass do that, since it would be no different than spinning a private server, customers shouldn’t have to learn how to analyse network packages and break DRM just to play a game they paid for because you turned off your server.

Either sell it as a subscription or sell it as packaged product, not both.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m old enough to remember when dedicated servers were the norm.

Oh sweet times before the matchmaking

permalink
report
parent
reply

Gaming

!gaming@lemmy.zip

Create post

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

  • No NSFW content

You can see Lemmy.zip’s rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:

  • Respectful Communication: We strive for positive, constructive dialogue and encourage all members to engage with one another in a courteous and understanding manner.
  • Inclusivity: Embracing diversity is at the core of our community. We welcome members from all walks of life and expect interactions to be conducted without discrimination.
  • Privacy: Your privacy is paramount. Please respect the privacy of others just as you expect yours to be treated. Personal information should never be shared without consent.
  • Integrity: We believe in the integrity of speech and action. As such, honesty is expected, and deceptive practices are strictly prohibited.
  • Collaboration: Whether you’re here to learn, teach, or simply engage in discussion, collaboration is key. Support your fellow members and contribute positively to shared learning and growth.

If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


Community stats

  • 2.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 1.8K

    Comments