Earth isnt a machine, we cant just fix it like a broken machine. Earth is a body with a fever due to CO2 intoxication. We need to let Earth lash itself back into wellbeing, without our invasive engripments.

Yeah, we need to stop framing this as overconsumption and instead frame it as overproduction.

The producers decides to push fartstuff onto us, which in itself creates artificial demand. At the same time they manipulate us through advertisements, movies and media to lust more for the superficial.

We need to remember to not hate the players, but hate the game. It’s the game that got us here, not the players.

Withdraw your support for the system.

📢📢📢Stop overproduction now📢📢📢

Delusional, just insane.

Technology will not save us, but guillotines will.

Withdraw your support for the system, stop voting, become anarchists, cultivate local communities rather than global communities.

I’m certainly normally aged.

I wouldnt identify as a progressive, because I am not a follower of progress through governments.

I rather want us to move our society away from governments and capital, because I view them as grippers.

Instead I want power to be where people are at. Empowered by for example the oakism framework that will guide them into having good language, attitudes and actions. That includes a response to what happens if somebody unjustifiably takes grip.

Ill check them out then, thanks for tip;)

If it is impossible to get into space because of garbage, we will stop dreaming about space exploration, and instead realize that we are stuck on Earth and that we need to take care of it.

“critique”

Don’t worry about that. I’m kind of asking for it when I’m such an language anarchist.

“Demystify”

To put it bluntly, the gripist attitude is why we are where we are today.

Our obsession with control over everything, to have a system that takes care of us so that we don’t need to understand the world. The gripist attitude has alienated us from everything and is the reason why we don’t stop the poisoning of Earth.

But a science communicator could never say that because it is outside the neutrality paradigm. Because nothing can be political, even when being political is the only way to make the message clear.