how tf there only 2 comments in this thread? Y’all this is SILENT HILL TWO and it’s scoring WELL I guess my reason is horror games aren’t really my cup of tea. but this is a BIG DEAL!

Edit: here’s a key passage from the Eurogamer review that is hype:

The original game was both combat-light and a little short, and Bloober has addressed both these issues head-on. For the latter, the remake has opened up a slew of new landmarks for us to explore, so I devoted a lot of time picking through the streets of Silent Hill, revelling in the new-found freedom of being able to visit shops and buildings that had hitherto been out of bounds for us. This, coupled with longer levels and more places to visit, more than doubles the original eight-ish hour run-time.

As for combat? Well, be careful what you wish for, I guess. Silent Hill 2 was outrageously easy, even on its hardest difficulty, and Bloober’s edition is not. The good news is Remake doesn’t exactly make combat central to the experience (at least, not on standard difficulty). But it sure does make it harder to adopt the typical survival horror strat of run-away-run-away-run-away. Because of its claustrophobic tight spaces and nooks and crannies, it’s incredibly difficult to retreat from a fight, and there is essentially no meaningful way to stealth around the place, either. On top of that, most boss battles - they are all here, as well as a surprise or two - will deplete your ammo reserves with ruthless efficiency. It’s also often tough to finish off foes without taking damage yourself as a result, burning through your ever-dwindling medical supplies. (Yes, Lying Figures spewing toxic vomit in your death throes - I’m looking at you.)

They took a legendary game and made it better. Props to Bloober team, guess they still got it.

fair! i guess i’m just saying, often when i am doing alt text, i feel a pressure from the community to get the name of every character and media reference correct, even if i am not familiar with the referenced media. I’m not sure what the correct way is to indicate that you aren’t trying to be critical, but I’m just putting that out there as a thing to be mindful of.

The OG roster, too! so sick!

exactly my point!

i’m fairly sure Lally is sharing and didn’t create the original meme. if it was that critical to the joke, the OP should have added in the caption from that frame of the show. If they did, I’m sure Lally would have included it in the alt text. As it is, a lot of people who see the meme without the aid of alt text might not get that part of the joke, so the alt text is doing a fine job of describing the image as it is.

I try to make my alt text include the source media if i can, but i don’t think it necessarily ruins the joke of the post just bc the alt text doesn’t say, “This is the character Eleanor Shellstrop from the show The Good Place”

"What stands out most clearly is that the Supreme Court, despite its effort to protect the former president and to erect a hurdle that was almost sky-high, made clear that it is possible to overcome that hurdle by specific proof that the former president, in his capacity as office-seeker, private capacity … sought to overturn an election that he knew he had lost,” said Tribe.

Idk, at this point I feel like this Supreme Court can and will erect any hurdle they like to advance their conservative agenda and protect their corrupted power.

i have never pretended to be posting OC. Just posting content that is new to beehaw. Also, likely the first time this comic has had human-generated alt text! I try to be “additive” in that way, at least.

I mean…it sounds like the Park Board isn’t even footing the bill, or at least not all of it:

The National Park Service, which owns neighboring land, asked for the change and is providing a grant for the project, Commissioner Steffanie Musich said.

I guess it would make sense for the neighbors requesting it (ie the NPS) to be the ones to actually build the fence, but given that they are contributing funds, this seems like kind of a non-issue. The neighbors don’t want dogs on their land. There are probably some asshole owners that let their dogs run into other people’s property and shit without picking it up. The original Strib article suggests that this has been a problem over the years:

It’s also the only Minneapolis dog park that isn’t completely fenced in. As a result, some dogs over the years have found their way out through the woods and into traffic. Many dog owners approve of finally building a fence that would safely contain their pets.

I get that it might be frustrating if you have been taking your dog there regularly for years. It’s hard to explain change to a dog. But overall this seems better for everyone, including dogs and dog owners.