There are multiple solutions:

1. You can deactivate Google
2. You can deactivate voice commands
3. You can let the assistant train on your voice, and when you do, try to not use your normal voice so that there won’t be false positives.

What if you’re watching Animal Planet like it’s porn?

I’m stuck in the third trisolaris book. Can’t get into it really.

Jo I don’t know much about Linux distros, but isn’t Ubuntu just Debian with some extra features?

Insta autocroppes everything to their completely dumb 1:1 format.

That is true but that does not answer the question. My opinion is that if you are pro peace you are automatically pro Russia, pro Ukraine or ideally both (I’m talking about the people and culture in it and not their leaders).

I am not arguing for Putin, I am arguing for the people in this war.

But yes I see your point. Maybe NATO could threaten with nuclear war if Russia ever attacks anything again, but that won’t change the problem.

I think the only way to stop Putin is with a revolution inside of Russia.

Russia promised that they would be a democratic country but since Putin’s “democratic” elections that promise was broken.

In my country we have a law inside the core of our basic lawbook that enables every institution and every human being living in the country to stop a dictatorship to arise by force because it is treated as self defense.

Wait Lemmy uses HTTP 1.1?

Inferior.

2 things:

1. The victors write history

2. After Lenin the USSR was not really communist anymore but more really a totalitarian state that didn’t believe in the values of communism. Just like China.

Everything would probably have been better if Lenin didn’t die so fast and then Trotsky would have ruled.

This is no conclusion. You can call it objective. All moral is based on subjectiveness: Different people have different morals. Especially ideology can have different morals. For example Nazism has a morality that the (in the eyes of the ruling party) “weak” kin should be exterminated and the “strong” kin should spread more and survive.

This is a moral standpoint, and because objects like “good” and “bad” are based on moral, the political correctness of the moral is subjective.

In ideology there is no right and wrong if you have no premises and no moral yourself, so to speak, if you’re really objective.

Calling something objective is in truth just reactionistic.

But of course I think that in any debate there should be moral premises, like for example a democratic parlament should always have the premise: “for the people”.

In reality it’s quite different sadly.

Of course different people again have different understandings on what makes everyone in a democratic society happy, but for example right wing parties that praise capitalism or fascism there are definitely people that would gain from that.

Capitalism has the consequence that the rich get richer, and so to not devalue the currency, the poorer have to get poorer, even if they don’t get less money, but the amount of money that exists devalues the money of the poor. Inflation. And if political power can be bought through lobbying or corruption, there does not exist a democracy.

Fascism has the consequence that one group of people become absolute and govern the rest which is definitely not democratic.