Avatar

oxysis

oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Joined
0 posts • 111 comments
Direct message

They have selected their next human

permalink
report
reply

They got plans and I am in love with them

permalink
report
parent
reply

Pups always get priority, doesn’t matter what I will drop whatever I am doing to pet them

permalink
report
reply

Hey look! Someone who can put 2 and 2 together and get 4!

Seriously though this is so fucking predictable why the fuck would they waste their time and resources on this?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Just like me fr fr

permalink
report
parent
reply

I choose to believe in the comically large ram theory

permalink
report
parent
reply

I absolutely agree these “researchers” deserve to lose their tenure and lose their funding. In my mind they don’t even deserve to be called researchers anymore as they view their job as an extractive one. They hold no regard for the people they impacted and how that impacts the entire fields of research.

If the university does protect these people than I can only hope that no one signs up to participate in any future studies they try to conduct.

permalink
report
parent
reply

It sickens me how people use the phrase to justify harming others.

permalink
report
parent
reply

There are very good reasons why our modern code of ethics exist in the first place. We as researchers are not there to do harm but instead to try to uplift the people we work with in the process. We are not there to extract information, but to work with people to help better understand how to improve their lives.

The Milgram Experiment while fascinating, is deeply unethical in its own right and should not be used as an example of anything other than the damage that is cause by conducting an unethical study. That study alone has cause many would be participants to walk away because how can they be trusted with a new study. The experiment was not stopped by the researchers when it was clear the participants were under high pressure and showing visible signs of stress. This is not an extractive field like you imply, it is a morally bankrupt philosophy to have that mindset.

Compensating participants is a sign of goodwill and shows you value their time and work put in. Does not matter if trauma is brought up or created like with the Milgram Experiment. You do it because it creates goodwill and helps people feel safer in the knowledge that both you and the institution you represent actually care. It is not for debate on what circumstances you offer compensation, you just offer it.

The greater good does not come with predatory extractive experiments but instead with studies that value and care for its participants. It is impossible to know just how many people have been turned away from participating because of studies like the one the article is on, the Milgram Experiment and the Stanford Prison Experiment. What we do know is that they have had an extremely negative effect on the perception of academic research and turn people away.

permalink
report
parent
reply