lemmylommy

„Er streitet alles ab“ ist, mit Verlaub, Blödsinn. Im Artikel ist lediglich die Rede davon, dass er das Produzieren abstreitet. Wer etwas so spezifisch formuliert, macht das in der Regel bewusst, um den Eindruck zu erzeugen, es aber tatsächlich nie gesagt zu haben, die gesamte Tat abzustreiten.

In seinem Fall ist das mindestens genau so große, wenn nicht sogar größere Problem das Verteilen. Das Abstreiten von „produzieren“ sagt exakt nichts über das Verteilen aus.

Und selbst das „Produzieren“ lässt noch genügend Interpretationsspielraum. Mich würde es überhaupt nicht wundern, wenn er irgendwann zugeben muss, dass er (Mit-)Verfasser war. In dem Fall wird er unter „produzieren“ dann wohl das Vervielfältigen verstanden haben, nicht aber auch die Urheberschaft.

Just don’t get too close to Till if you are a woman.

Sollte sie es schaffen, idiotische Nichtwähler zu mobilisieren, wäre aber auch niemandem geholfen.

Ja. Schmeckt nach Plastik.

How is CDPR on the same level as EA?

In the distance I saw a police car approaching. Quickly I slipped into the driver’s seat of the VW Golf, shattered rear shelf remnants poking at my back. Heart pounding, I grabbed a handful of candies, hoping my impromptu candy feast would throw off suspicion. “Just a guy enjoying a snack,” I thought, praying the police wouldn’t dig deeper.

Rookie Officer Daniels and I rolled through the quiet streets, and his eyes widened at the sight of a small European car with a shattered rear shelf. “Should we check it out?” he asked nervously. Glancing at the driver indulging in candies, I chuckled, “Nah, just some late-night snackin’. Welcome to the quirks of the job, Daniels.” Oblivious to the potential connection to recent car burglaries, we continued our patrol.

Finally alone in the car, I eyed the wallet I had found in the glovebox with a mix of temptation and paranoia. “Easy money, or avoid the risk?” I muttered to myself. The dilemma weighed on me as I calculated the consequences. Taking it could mean a fatter wallet but also a certain police report. I hesitated, torn between greed and the fear of drawing unwanted attention to my nocturnal activities.

If you ever get these after a contacting customer care, here is how they work:

10/10: ok. No need to reprimand employee

9/10: acceptable every now and then

Anything less than 9/10: talk to employee about their low performance and lacking commitment

This applies to all questions asked, including “how is the weather?” and “did you sleep well tonight?”

So here is how I answer, knowing how it works:

Employee helped me or at least tried to (and was hindered by company bullshit): 10/10, no exception. Yes, I will sacrifice my firstborn on your corporate altar and will build a shrine to your CEO in my bedroom. Of course I will recommend [product] and to anyone and everyone I will ever meet and praise [company] with my dying breath.

Mediocre service: no reply

Truly awful service, employee was a dick: 2-4/10, so it does not look like petty revenge, but is still bad

Unfortunately this generation google is getting less proficient at search as well. It’s like it treats the search term as a vague idea and any syntax as a non binding suggestion.

Mooooment. Hatte Väterchen Wladimir nicht uns im dekadenten Westen Frieren versprochen?

Russisches Gas und Öl.