Isnt that several years old? Or did it happen again?

This is Satire. Its not real.

GM: it rolls to attack. Oh that’s a 2

Player: PFF easy

GM: for a total of 47, dealing 70 damage and you are grabbed.

GM: for its other 5 attacks …

My favourite is its reflect ability. If the players pull some meta bullshit like dropping tungsten rods from orbit the tarrasque can just play an uno reverso card and nuke the players.

And cars have outpaced Olympic runners. Does that make the fastest humans ever “second place”?

Never heard of iDEAL. Wikipedia says its a a Dutch system that was acquired by the “European payments initiative” last year. The EPI just became active as a payment system 1 month ago.

This is VERY much still in development and not at all an established system in the EU.

Both charts are in L of pure alcohol. I feel like they are not the “top counties” but just a random selection. And the selection is different for both charts.

TLDR chart bad

So Uganda Drinks 14L of “other” but doesn’t appear at all in the total consumption?

Exactly. If you are in the path of the eclipse and dont make it an event for the kids, you failed as a place of education and learning!

If your mind is a tabula rasa maybe you should erase your tabula cerata to match

Fines as a percentage of income is a good idea for individuals but I dont think it works for coorperations.

A more reasonable approach is:

• 100% of the money they earned/saved by comiting the crime
• 100% of all damages caused to other people/cost to clean up results of the crime (includes the cost of investigation and prosecution)
• a fine that represents the likelihood of getting caught. (If the crime earns me 1mil, the fine is 50mil but I only have a 1% chance to get caught, statistically I should commit the crime as many times as possible because I will end up wining in the end)
• (optionally) a fine based on the crime. This one might be based on the size of the company. This is the “punishment” part. It probably should be payed by the individuals responsible and not the company.

This third point is the important one. Cooperations comit crimes because they are reasonable monetary investments. If the expected fines are always higher than the expected earnings, crimes become a bad investment.