codexarcanum
For as much as people talk it up, I thought there was a lot to it. There isn’t.
A dialectic is a tool for thinking through a problem or idea. You start with an idea or concept (called the Thesis) and then you consider the forces and concepts that lie in opposition to the chosen one (called the Antithesis). After considering both, you try to understand the relationships between the two things and how they support, oppose, and generate each other. This unified understanding of how the two concepts are actually one concept through these connections is called the Synthesis.
Dialectical Materialism is applying the dialectic as a tool while also keeping in mind physical/material reality and the ways in which physical/material constraints influence these things.
For example you might ask “Why do rebellions occur in formally peaceful states?” Your thesis is “rebellion” and so your antithesis is something like “the state” or “status quo.” Through materialism, you’d ask questions like “where do the rebels/state acquire food, shelter, weapons, etc. What is the role of poverty in fomenting rebellion?”
Through synthesis, you would come to conclusions like “the people pay taxes to fund the state, but some people also devote a larger share of their time and resources to the rebellion.” Or: “Rebel recruitment goes up after police crackdowns, a lighter hand with policing may reduce re-occurrences of riots.”
Because this isn’t ideal dialectics (not “ideal” like optimal but “ideal” as in “concerning ideas and immaterial things.”) So we’d be less concerned with “what is the rebellions stated aim” or “what is the state’s majority religion?” you can make these questions material though: “what do the rebels hope to gain materially” or “how is the state religion funded and enforced?”
And although I’m just riffing an example, in real life when using this tool to convince others of your sound logic, it is best to have actual references and data to support the conclusions derived. This gives reality to the material considerations.
After Some More News went on the recent silly tangent about Trump guitars, I fine the theory that none of these products even exist extremely believable.
- Take picture of existing luxury object (Gibson guitars, high end sneakers, fabrige eggs)
- Barf some hideous Trump branding all over it in Photoshop.
ProfitLaundering!
If your system allows (or even requires) a small number of people with no oversight to be responsible for a large number of people’s well-being, that’s a bad system.
“Get Good” has always been a sarcastic joke because relying on “goodness” in any sense never works. Hold people accountable, what we need is accountable leaders.
Lacking Short Circuit (86) and Real Genius (85), two of the most iconic 80s scifi films. They just don’t make them casually bigoted like those anymore!
m
It’s only “wage theft”
when they take time from you.
But slack off for what’s left:
shocked pikachu