Waldowal
No “Roger Rabbit”? Pshhh…
I don’t like developers getting blamed for what is often due to being rushed to arbitrary deadlines from management. But, I will say I agree with the article in that a large portion of the development toolbox is completely fucked. The last 15 years of most business development has basically been this:
- Let’s implement cool JS frameworks that don’t really work with the browser natively!
- Let’s execute browser code on the server and server code on the browser!
- Let’s transpile code to artificially improve upon native languages and make our JS frameworks easier to code. We need a transpilation tool!
- Let’s take “DRY” way too far! Everything we need should already be in existing code packages we can combine together. We need a package manager tool!
- Uh oh, it’s too hard to start projects. We need a scaffolding tool!
- Uh oh, we now have too many packages. We need a bundling tool!
- Uh oh, our development environments are now too complicated to setup. We need a virtualization container tool!
- Uh oh, we have too many virtual machines. We need a container management tool!
- Uh oh, deployments are super complicated now. We need deployment automation tools!
- Ok, NOW we’re setup to code 20% faster, but we need 3 new DevOps employees to support all this.
- Oh yea, we’re “agile” now too. I think that means we fire our QA testers. I’m not sure. We can’t agree on what being “agile” even means.
Not saying it’s all bad. Mostly good ideas that have gone off the rails.
When the chest hair grows back, it’s going to a whole new level.
Obama’s comedic timing there was spot on.
They can’t decide if they need the money upfront to fund the research and trials, or if they have to price gouge people for the result to get paid back for the research and trials.
I figured Joe Pesci was done after The Irishman.
As we know from Gore and Clinton, national numbers mean jack shit. Vote!