I dismissed your idea because it’s bad. I decided to not waste my time explaining on the basis of the language you use.

The fact that I have to clarify this confirms I made the right decision.

I’m not taking scientific inputs by somebody who starts sentences with “bro”.

You need to put the heat somewhere. In the vacuum, heat can only transfer by radiation, which is much less efficient.

It is notoriously hard to cool things in space. There’s no water or air to dump the heat.

So no harm, noted.

Pay to be the “truth” on a fact checking tool? Fox news is very interested.

It’s… Challenging. Like the pet eating thing, there are many sources saying it’s true and many saying it’s false. Official sources can lie (Russia came to mind for no reason whatsoever), so we rely on sources we already trust, which is tricky and even subjective.

I imagine that “if in Fox then False” is a good start, but aside from that I can only think it getting extra sources, also a challenge without real time web crawling of the internet, were google and Microsoft are already light years ahead.

As a data scientist, trust me: you don’t want us developing ANYTHING else. You guys dogged a bullet having us busy.

They can, but why? If I can be enabled/disabled, what’s the harm? If I thought Firefox is nefarious it wouldn’t use it at all, not just avoid their extensions. It’s not like that’s the only way they could have to spy of it was the goal.

This will be aimed for the average Joe that thinks it’s “neat” edge has it and doesn’t know about extensions.

Mullvad and Librewolf might have it disabled, it’s an easy switch.

I can’t believe that.

Is that the average for every underage on Europe? Specific range of ages? Filtering out those who don’t spend/play at all? It’s a crazy number to throw with no extra context.