NotAnonymousAtAll

Would you mind elaborating on that thought?

Schade, dass in dem Artikel Alternativen wie Lemmy oder Kbin gar nicht erwähnt werden.

Mir erschließt sich der Sinn hinter der Platzierung des “-” nicht. Wäre Berlina-tor nicht passender?

Link to full list: https://sanctions.nazk.gov.ua/en/boycott/

With Unilever, Mondelez and Procter & Gamble on that list, shopping for groceries and hygiene products might get complicated if you actually want to boycott all of them.

Feels weird to not see Nestlé on a list of big (food) companies doing questionable things.

Die Überlappung zwischen Veganismus und Öko-Schwurbelei (“Natur gut, Chemie schlecht, ich brauch keine logischen Gründe weil isso!”) ist leider relativ groß.

Das nervt, macht aber den Veganismus an sich nicht weniger gut.

The original post advocates for a holistic, collaborative approach; management and technical experts should be working together to align technical and organizational structure. I fully agree with that view (and I’m not a manager).

There is more than enough “shit managers say” material out there, but this is not it.

I read it similar, but also kind of from the other side: If your organization is set up in a way that ignores the technical requirements of the product, your are going to have a bad time.

And yes, of course this is more often on the bad side than on the good side in practice. If everything was already fine most of the time, there would be no point in discussing this topic.

That is pretty much a given. Why else write about it at all?

Nowhere in that text does it say “managers are the real software architects”. What it does say is “what managers do affects software architecture”. Sure you can extrapolate that to delusions of grandeur, but if you take into account the explicit call for collaboration it is much more likely what was meant is more along the lines of “we can mess things up if we ignore the architecture, so let’s talk to the real software architects before making org decisions”.

About the comic: That one does have the line “management designs software architecture”, much closer to the negative interpretation; but that too can be interpreted in a more positive way as “… and we are not good at that, so let’s make sure to bring in the people who are good at it at important points”.

“Die Bewachung des ruhenden Verkehrs ist eine hoheitliche Aufgabe und sollte auch hoheitlichen Stellen vorbehalten sein”, meint Sandra Saur. Sie unterscheidet aber zwischen Privatanzeigen von betroffenen Personen und Massenanzeigen, die politische Motive hätten. Etwa 80 Prozent der Privatanzeigen in Freiburg würden laut Sandra Saur von einer einzigen Person stammen.

Es ist schon ziemlich dreist das Bestreben geltendes Recht auch tatsächlich durchzusetzen als politisches Motiv zu bezeichnen. Und wenn die Privatanzeigen zu viel Extraarbeit machen, setzt halt die Regeln selbst ordentlich durch statt zu meckern wenn es jemand anders macht!