Should be tagged nsfw.

No part of my comment suggests otherwise.

With that absolutely pathetic follower count I’m not too surprised it’s still going under the radar.

Compared to curators that people actually care about, that’s a fraction of a fraction.

"In desperation, it repeats the words in an attempt to have the last word.

Unaware, that if the last words spoken are obviously meaningless, they aren’t last words at all. But simply the pathetic death-cry of a loser."

I do hope you reflect on what I’ve told you, despite my being mean. You’re clearly not so dumb as to be completely without hope. Even if I’m wrong, which I well might be, your arguing skills are so bad they actively sabotage your own message.

"Observe, as the creature finally clams up completely, refusing all exchange. Resorting to a final four words that carry no meaning whatsoever, except the implied ‘fuck you’.

Truly, a deep thinker of the interwebs."

Look at it this way, I didn’t declare an end to our delightful little chat, I declared my victory in the original matter.

You stopped forwarding arguments and counter-arguments two comments in, giving me the win by default.

All you have left, is acting like the ball is in my court and I’m the one who is refusing to make the next move.

How about three fronts? I have a lot to say so more bite-sized bits would help get through you non-existent attention span.

I keep laughing at this “someone elses problem” point. I can’t refute it without revealing way too much personal info, its such a perfect non-argument.

You don’t know shit about how close I’ve been to these matters irl, and I can’t tell you.

I see you’re in the final stages of clamming up completely. This string of non-responses is an attempt at annoying me until I go away.

You’ve given up on trying to actually prove me wrong, because you can’t. Or at least don’t know how to properly try.

Please, figure it out. If not for me, then the next exchange you engage in.

What responsibilities? What part of what I’ve said tells you I’m avoiding them?

I want you to see the errors you’ve made in presenting your argument and dismantling mine. I point out third parties because I want to provoke YOU into taking an outside look at your own words.

Then we’ll be able to talk for real. Not this mudslinging that idiots do.