Khanzarate
Nah there’s a bunch of laws about that. In fact, in general, quickly seizing land then immediately joining the big group of allies working at not getting into any fights is frowned upon by the guys who don’t wanna get into fights.
Contested territory has a bunch of rules and regulations all its own. Russia sucks, but them’s the rules.
It doesn’t say cast without paying mana costs so I basically read it as “end as many fights you want if you’re OK with recasting your creatures this turn or losing them.”
Helpful if your opponent benefits from the fight itself, like a creature that adds a +1/+1 counter every time they kill a creature.
Also great for ETB/LTB triggers. Any time you’d like to return a creature to your hand to play again, this is probably great. Since you wanna return it anyway, you get to deal free damage if your opponent doesn’t wanna let you redo an ETB trigger. Feels like a combat Ward in that sense. Your opponent pays the creature’s Power in order to prevent an extra ETB trigger.
But you do get to pay for each time you do this, so I doubt It’ll let you run away with anything, just get you an extra trigger or a few extra points of damage.
Could pair with ninjutsu as a fallback. If blocked, exile it, replay it, get any ETB/LTB triggers. If not blocked, Ninjutsu it, do the usual ninja things, replay it, get the ETB/LTB triggers, too. Doesn’t work as well on the ninjas themselves though, they usually cost more to play normally, so exile/replay is costly and might be beyond your mana.
Completely agree.
The only reason the relative had it at all was because of those old fears. As soon as I learned that they had it bundled with the computer (hate that. Malware’s gotta get in somewhere though I guess), I knew why it was being slow.
I hold this up as an example because even their own troubleshooting website and a program dedicated to the purpose above and beyond the usual uninstaller couldn’t do it though. Avast doesn’t even know its own malware.
Also this nonsense got me the chance to put mint on their computer, but the “switch to Linux” argument isn’t constructive in this particular spot. They didn’t end up sticking to it because a required-for-school piece of software for tests just doesn’t do Linux at all. Couldn’t get it to run in wine or even a virtual machine either, and they’re not great at the whole computer thing so I didn’t wanna be tech support for dual booting.
Here’s an example. I removed avast via the uninstaller on a relatives computer, it made it laggy as hell. I restart after as the uninstaller demands, but it was still there.
Searching, I find this official support option. https://support.avast.com/en-us/article/10
The official Avast Uninstall Tool, the tool to use when the included uninstaller didn’t work.
The official uninstall tool didn’t work either. I ran it in safe mode, like it said. Didn’t work, either, but it removed some stuff, and finally let me delete some things manually. Ran it again in safe mode after that, finally seems to have removed everything.
Anyway it’s a great example of if a company doesn’t know what they’re about, windows has no process to recover from that. Window’s process is identical to a Walmart employee saying. “I dunno, man, contact the manufacturer.” Genuinely, its usually enough, but when its not, there’s absolutely no recourse.
They wiggle around to clean your eye and keep debris out of it.
The issue here is because they’re linked by the owner. If one stock goes up/down, the other does too. This has happened repeatedly with these two companies specifically, even.
So although they don’t own stock in the company in question, they still have a stock in seeing it succeed. Its success will bring about their own financial gain.
The fact that this issue was voiced and they specifically took the action that raises questions about authenticity also means we must question if that’s even the goal. If this went to a different judge, after all, one with no bias, then if this judge is unbiased, he should expect the same outcome. Of course, if he were biased and intended to give a biased ruling to take advantage of the chance to directly increase his wealth, then we’d expect him to be reluctant to let another judge rule on it. He could miss his financial opportunity, after all.
Tips are just added to what you made so yeah, it counts wherever an hourly wage counts.
However the current system just gets people not to report tips, so realistically they’re paying a lot less into SS anyway. It’s basically just the government going “alright let’s make that official instead of tax fraud”