With a gentle half-smile: Honestly? It was a blast.

Not sure what the next one is, but the last one will be the “War on internal terror” aka IWOT. After that it’s over

You ignored something as bluntly unlawful as orwelian Patrioct Act becouse it was happening to “them”. The ammended one will happen to you.

Ok, but ir’s a cheat code for non-existing problem since non of those countries tax you with addituonal tarifs.

Both of those seems very rational in term of maximazing value.

What’s /c/ here?

You’ll realy enjoy this:

https://www.boredpanda.com/worst-domain-names/

You are observing just one side of the equation: people who watched adds are using a product.

You don’t see the other part that is the problem. Cos of running those ads is higher than a profit gained from additional sales.

A similar case was with scans from “mobile scanners”. Since those are used on patients to sick to be transported, their cases were disproportionaly “malicious”. Model was effectively optimozed to detected if scaner was stationary or mobile.

Thank you. At glance it seems like the difference between CC0 and CC-SA in copyright with some additiona rules about what exactly count as “publishing” stuf. That was very helpful.

So… OP’s “hot” take is “losers exist”?